Molecular genetic consequences of a population bottleneck associated with reintroduction of the Mauna Kea silversword (Argyroxiphium sandwicense ssp. sandwicense [Asteraceae])

Conservation Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 1140-1146

  Robichaux, Robert H ^a,c   Friar, Elizabeth A ^a   Mount, David W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

^c RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC VARIATION; OUTPLANTING; POLLEN TRANSFER; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; REINTRODUCTION; SILVERSWORD;

USA, HAWAII, HAWAII, MAUNA KEA;

EID: 0031405235     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96314.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barrett, S. C. II., and J. R. Kohn. 1991. Genetic and evolutionär)' consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. Pages 3-30 in D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Bonnell, M. L., and R. K. Selandcr. 1974. Elephant seals: genetic variation and near extinction. Science 184:908-909.
3. Byers, D. L., and T. R. Meagher. 1992. Mate availability in small populations of plant species with homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility. Heredity 68:353-359.
4. Carr, G. D. 1985. Monograph of the Hawaiian Madiinac (Astcraceae): Argyroxtphtuiu, Dnbnittiii, and Wilkesia. Allcrtonia 4:1-123.
5. Carr, G. D., E. A. Powell, and D. W. Kyhos. 1986. Self-incompatibility in the Hawaiian Madiinac (Compositae): an exception to Baker's rule. Evolution 40:430-434.
6. DeMauro, M. M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Jlymenoxys ticiinlis var. gliibnf). Conservation Biology 7:542-550.
7. Falk, D. A., C. I. Millar, and M. OIwcll. 1996. Guidelines for developing a rare plant reintroduction plan. Pages 453-490 in D. A. Falk, C. I. iMillar, and M. OIwcll, editors. Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
8. Friar, E. A., R. H. Robichaux, and D. W. Mount. 1996. Molecular genetic variation following a population crash in the endangered Mauna Kea silversword, Arfyroxipbtum scitiiltriccnse ssp. santltclcctise (Asteraceae). Molecular Ecology 5:687-691.
9. Guerrant, E. O., Jr. 1992. Genetic and demographic considerations in the sampling and reintroduction of rare plants. Pages 321-344 in P. L Fiedler and S. K. Jain, editors. Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. Chapman & Hall, New York.
10. Guerrant, E. O., Jr. 1996. Designing populations: demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. Pages 171-207 in D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar, and M. OIwcll, editors. Restoring diversity: strategics for reintroduction of endangered plants. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
11. Haig, S. M., J. D. Ballon, and S. R. Derrickson. 1990. Management options for preserving genetic diversity: reintroduction of Guam Rails to the wild. Conservation Uiology 4:290-300.
12. Hanna, W. W. 1990. Long-term storage ofPennisetuiii glaticmn (L.) R. lir. pollen. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79:605-608.
13. Hoclzel, A. R., J. Halley, C. Campagna, T. Arnbom, B. Le Boeuf, S. J, O'Brien, K. Rails, and G. A. Dover. 1993. Elephant seal genetic variation and the use of simulation models to investigate historical population bottlenecks. Journal of Heredity 84:443-449. '
14. Les, D. II., J. A. Reinartz, and E. J. Esselman. 1991. Genetic consequences of rarity in Aster fiiraitns (Asteraceae), a threatened, selfincompatible plant. Evolution 45:1641-1650.
15. Loebel, D. A., R. K. Nurthen, R. Frankham, D. A. Briscoc, and D. Cra-ven. 1992. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosopbila populations: consequences of equalizing founder representation. Zoo Biology 11:319-332.
16. Lynch, M., and B. G. Milligan. 1994. Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology 3:91-99.
17. Pavlik, B. M. 1994. Demographic monitoring and the recover)' of endangered plants. Pages 322-350 in M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whelan, editors. Restoration of endangered species: conceptual issues, planning, and implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Powcll, E. A. 1992. Life history, reproductive biology, and conservation of the Mauna Kca silversword, Argyroxtpbium sandirtccnse DC (Asteraceae), an endangered plant of Hawaii. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
19. Schemske, D. W., B. C. Husband, M. H. Ruckelshaus, C. Goodwillic, I. M. Parker, and J. G. Bishop. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584-606.
20. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. II. Freeman, New York.
21. Templeton, A. R. 1991. Off-site breeding of animals and implications for plant conservation strategies. Pages 182-194 in D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Towill, L. E. 1985. Low temperature and freeze-/vacuum-drying preservation of pollen. Pages 171-198 in K. K. Kartha, editor. Cryopreservation of plant cells and organs. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Sen ice (USFWS). 1994. Recover)- plan for the Mauna Kea silversword (Argyroxipljinin saiuliricense ssp. sandwiccusc). Portland, Oregon.
24. Wayne, R. K., et ai. 1991. Conservation genetics of the endangered Isle Royale gray wolf. Conservation Biology 5:41-51.