An analysis of accelerated vehicle retirement programs using a discrete choice personal vehicle model

Transport Policy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 95-107

  Kavalec, Chris ^a   Setiawan, Winardi ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; PLANNING METHOD; TRANSPORT PLANNING; VEHICLE RETIREMENT;

USA, CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES;

EID: 0031404784     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(97)00009-7     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Alberini, A., Harrington, W. and McConnell, V. (1995) Determinants of participation in accelerated vehicle retirement programs. RAND Journal of Economics, 26(1), 93-112.
2. Alberini, A., Harrington, W. and McConnell, V. (1996) Estimating an emissions supply function from accelerated vehicle retirement programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(3), 251-265.
3. Alberini, A., Harrington, W., McConnell, V. and Edelstein, D. (1994) Reducing emissions from old cars - the economics of the Delaware Vehicle Retirement Program. Discussion Paper 94-27, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
4. Hahn, R. W. (1995) An economic analysis of scrappage. Rand Journal of Economics, 26(2), 222-242.
5. Kavalec, C. (1996) CALCARS: the California Conventional and Alternative Fuel Response Simulator - a vehicle demand/choice model for California. Staff Report #P500-96-003, California Energy Commission, Sacramento.
6. Sierra Research (1995) Vehicle scrappage: an alternative to more stringent new vehicle standards in California. Report # SR95-03-02, Prepared for Texaco, Inc., Sierra Research, Inc., Sacramento.
7. Train, K. (1986) Qualitative Choice Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge.
8. Washington, S. (1993) Benefit-cost analysis of a vehicle scrappage program. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Transportation Forum.