Public technological aid to support compliance to environmental standards

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 228-239

  Stranlund, John K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AID PROVISIONS; EMISSIONS CONTROL; INDUSTRIAL REGULATION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 0031404708     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1997.1014     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Amacher G. S., Malik A. S. Bargaining in environmental regulation and the ideal regulator. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 30:1996;233-253.
2. Arora S., Cason T. An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 program. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 28:1995;271-286.
3. Carraro C., Soubeyran A. Environmental policy and the choice of production technology. Environmental Policy and Market Structure. 1996;Kluwer, Boston.
4. DeCanio S. Agency and control problems in US corporations: The case of energy-efficient investment projects. J. Econom. Bus. 1:1994;105-123.
5. Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Lit. 26:1988;1120-1171.
6. Garvie D., Keeler A. Incomplete enforcement with endogenous regulatory choice. J. Public Econom. 55:1994;141-162.
7. Gray W. B., Deily M. E. Compliance and enforcement: Air pollution in the U.S. steel industry. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 31:1996;96-111.
8. Jaffe A. B., Stavins R. N. Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: The effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 29:1995;S43-S63.
9. Jung C., Krutilla K., Boyd R. Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level: An evaluation of policy alternatives. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 30:1996;95-111.
10. Keeler A. G. Noncompliant firms in transferable discharge permit markets: Some extensions. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 21:1991;180-189.
11. Kemp R. Environmental Policy and Technical Change. 1997;Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
12. Laplante B., Rilstone P. Environmental inspections and emissions of the pulp and paper industry in Quebec. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 31:1996;19-36.
13. Malik A. S. Enforcement costs and the choice of policy instruments for controlling pollution. Econom. Inquiry. 30:1992;714-721.
14. Milliman S. R., Prince R. Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 17:1989;247-265.
15. Russell C. S. Monitoring and enforcement. Portney P. Public Polices for Environmental Protection. 1990;Resources for the Future, Washington.
16. Russell C. S., Harrington W., Vaughn W. J. Enforcing Pollution Control Laws. 1986;Resources for the Future, Washington.
17. Stranlund J. Public mechanisms to support compliance to an environmental norm. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 28:1995;205-222.
18. EPA's 33/50 Program Second Progress Report: Reducing Risks Through Voluntary Action. 1992;U.S. EPA, Washington.
19. Green Lights: An Enlightened Approach to Energy Efficiency and Pollution. 1993;U.S. EPA, Washington.