Dumping on free trade: The U.S. import trade laws

Southern Economic Journal

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 402-424

  Stiglitz, Joseph E ^a  

^a WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FREE TRADE; IMPORT RESTRICTION; TRADE POLICY; URUGUAY ROUND;

USA;

EID: 0031403824     PISSN: 00384038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1060858     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Areeda, P., and D. Turner. 1975. Predatory pricing and related practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. Harvard Law Review 88:697-733.
2. Baker, J. 1989. Recent developments in economics that challenge Chicago school views. Antitrust Law Journal 58:645-55.
3. Baldwin, R., and M. Moore. 1991. Political aspects of the administration of the trade remedy laws. In Down in the dumps: Administration of the U.S. unfair trade laws, edited by R. Boltuck and R. Litan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 253-87.
4. Baumol, W. 1993. Entrepreneurship, management, and the structure of payoffs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bayard, T., and K. Elliot. 1994. Reciprocity and retaliation in U.S. trade policy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
6. Boltuck, R., and Litan, R. 1991. Down in the dumps: Administration of the U.S. unfair trade laws. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
7. Brander, J., and P. Krugman. 1983. A 'reciprocal dumping' model of international trade. Journal of International Economics 15:313-21.
8. Brander, J., and B. Spencer. 1984. Tariff protection and imperfect competition. In Monopolistic competition and international trade, edited by H. Kierzkowski. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 194-206.
9. Brander, J., and B. Spencer. 1985. Export subsidies and market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics 18: 83-100.
10. Cass, R., and S. Narkin. 1991. Antidumping and countervailing duty law: The United States and the GATT. In Down in the dumps: Administration of the U.S. unfair trade laws, edited by R. Boltuck and R. Litan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 208-12.
11. Committee on Finance. 1968. U.S. Senate international antidumping code. Ninetieth Congress, Second Session, June 27.
12. Committee on Ways and Means. 1993. Overview and compilation of U.S. trade statutes. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
13. Congressional Budget Office. 1994. A review of U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty law and policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
14. Council of Economic Advisers. 1994. Economic report of the President 1994. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
15. Dale, R. 1980. Anti-dumping law in a liberal trade order. New York: St. Martin's Press.
16. Dixit, A. 1987. How should the United States respond to other countries' trade policies? In U.S. trade policies in a changing world economy, edited by R. Stern. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 245-82.
17. Dixit, A., and R. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Financial Times, 14 June 1994. Steel duties rejected, p. 4.
19. Financial Times, 10 August 1994. US trade sleuth in search of fairness, p. 4.
20. Finger, J. M. 1993. Antidumping: How it works and who gets hurt. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21. Francois, J. 1992. Optimal commercial policy with international returns to scale. Canadian Journal of Economics 25: 184-95.
22. Francois, J., N. D. Palmeter, and J. Anspacher. 1991. Conceptual and procedural biases in the administration of the countervailing duty law. In Down in the dumps: Administration of the U.S. unfair trade laws, edited by R. Bolluck and R. Litan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
23. Frum, David. 1992. Dump it. Forbes, 28 September, p. 64.
24. Garten, J. 1994. The United States in a changing world economy: Recent speeches. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
25. Hansen, W., and T. Prusa. 1993. Does administrative protection protect? A reexamination of the U.S. Title VII and escape clause statutes. Cato Review of Business and Government Regulation Winter:35-6.
26. Hart, M. 1990. Idealism versus pragmatism: Policy and the academic analyst. In Fair exchange: Reforming the trade remedy laws, edited by M. Trebilcock and R. York. Toronto: CD Howe Institute.
27. Helpman, E., and P. Krugman. 1989. Trade policy and market structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Jackson, J. 1989. The world trading system: Law and policy of international economic relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Jackson, J. 1994. Managing the trading system: The World Trade Organization and the post-Uruguay Round GATT agenda. In Managing the world economy: Fifty years after Bretton Woods, edited by P. Kenen. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
30. Krugman, P. 1984. Import protection as export promotion: International competition in the presence of oligopoly and economies of scale. In Monompolistic competition and international trade, edited by H. Kierzkowski. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. Krugman, P. 1986. Strategic trade policy and the new international economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Krugman, P. 1987. Is free trade passe? Journal of Economic Perspectives 1:131-44.
33. Krugman, P. 1994. Empirical evidence of the new trade theories: The current state of play. In New trade theories: A look at the empirical evidence. Centre for Economic Policy Research.
34. Leidy, M. 1994. Trade policy and indirect rent seeking: A synthesis of recent work. Economics and Politics 6:97-115.
35. Murray, T. 1991. The administration of the antidumping duty law by the Department of Commerce. In Down in the dumps: Administration of the U.S. unfair trade laws, edited by R. Boltuck and R. Litan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
36. Nivola, P. 1993. Regulating unfair trade. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
37. OECD Working Party No. 1. 1994. Chapter 2: Census and analysis of antidumping actions in the United States. In Working Party No. 1 on competition and international trade: Antidumping and competition policy, draft (6/4/ 94). Washington, DC: OECD.
38. Office of the United States Trade Representative. 1994. Trade policy agenda and 1993 annual report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Trade Representative's Office.
39. Spence, M. 1981. The learning curve and competition. Bell Journal of Economics 12:49-70.
40. Staiger, R., and F. Wolak. 1994a. The determinants and impacts of antidumping suit petitions in the United States: An industry level analysis. In New trade theories: A look at the empirical evidence. Centre for Economic Policy Research.
41. Staiger, R., and F. Wolak. 1994b Measuring industry-specific protection: Antidumping in the United States. In Brookings papers: Microeconomics 1994. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 51-118.
42. Stewart, T. 1991. Administration of the antidumping laws: A different perspective. In Down in the dumps: Administration of the U.S. unfair trade laws, edited by R. Boltuck and R. Litan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 288-330.
43. Thompson, T. 1994. Dumping on trade. The Washington Post, 18 July, p. A19.
44. Thurow, L. 1985. The zero sum solution: Building a world-class American economy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
45. Trebilcock, M. 1990. Throwing deep: Trade remedy laws in a first-best world. In Fair exchange: Reforming the trade remedy laws, edited by M. Trebilcock and R. York. Toronto: CD Howe Institute, pp. 249-50.
46. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1990. Internal trade: The use of the GATT Antidumping Code. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
47. Viner, J. 1923. Dumping: A problem in international trade. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.