Predicting men's perceptions of date rape using the heuristic-systematic model

Journal of Sex Education and Therapy

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 25-32

  Osman, Suzanne L ^a   Davis, Clive M ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; PERCEPTION; RAPE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0031403315     PISSN: 01614576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01614576.1997.11074190     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cassidy, L., & Hurrell, R. M. (1995). The influence of victim's attire on adolescents' judgments of date rape. Adolescence, 30, 319-323.
2. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
3. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.) Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol.5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H.(1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.) Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M.(1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger vs. acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344-356.
6. Costin, R (1985). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 319-325.
7. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8. Fischer, G. J. (1987). Hispanic and majority student attitudes toward forcible date rape as a function of differences in attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 17, 93-101.
9. Godchilds, J. D., & Zellman, G., (1984). Sexual signaling and sexual aggression in adolescent relationships. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.) Pornography and sexual aggression (pp. 233-243). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10. Jenkins, M. J., & Dambrot, F. H.(1987). The attribution of date rape: Observers' attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 875-895.
11. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H.(1989). The effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
12. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H.(1990). Involvement and persuasion: Types, traditions, and the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 375-384.
13. Kirk, R. E.(1995). Experimental design: Procedures for them behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
14. Korman, S. K.(1983). Nontraditional dating behavior: Date initiation and date expense-sharing among feminists and nonfeminists. Family Relations, 32, 575-581.
15. Mills, C. S., & Granoff, B. J. (1992). Date and acquaintance rape among a sample of college students, journal of the National Association of Social Workers, 37, 504-509.
16. Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M.(1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150-163.
17. Muehlenhard, C., (1988). "Nice women" don't say yes and real men don't say no: How miscommunication and the double standard can cause sexual problems. Women and Therapy, 7, 95-108.
18. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Felts, A. S. (in press). Sexual beliefs scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), A handbook of sexuality-related measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Muehlenhard, C. L., Friedman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M.(1985). Is date rape justifiable r The effects of dating activity: Who initiated, who paid and men's attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 297-309.
20. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C.(1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872-879.
21. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.
22. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H.(1990). Applied linear statistical models (3rd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
23. Osman, S. L.(1994). Predispositional and situational factors influencing men's perceptions of date rape. Unpublished master's thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
24. Osman, S. L.(1995, April). Predispositional and situational factors influencing men's perceptions of date rape. Paper presented at the eastern meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Atlantic City, NJ.
25. Osman, S. L. (in press). The Token Resistance to Sex Scale. In C. M. Davis, W.? Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), A handbook of sexuality-related measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T.(1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
27. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Verlag; New York.
28. Sandberg, G., Jackson, T. L., & Petretic-Jackson, P. (1987). College students' attitudes regarding sexual coercion and aggression: Developing educational and preventive strategies. Journal of College Student Personnel, 20, 302-311.
29. Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimental based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220-232.