Variability in penile appearance and penile findings: A prospective study

British Journal of Urology

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 776-782

  Van Howe, R S ^a  

^a MARSHFIELD CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Abnormalities; Adhesions; Balanitis; Circumcision; Penis; Phimosis

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ADOLESCENT; AGE; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BALANITIS; CHILD; CIRCUMCISION; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PENIS; PENIS DISEASE; PENIS GLANS; PERSONAL HYGIENE; PHIMOSIS; PREPUCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031403028     PISSN: 00071331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00467.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brown MS, Brown CA. Circumcision decision: prominence of social concerns. Pediatrics 1987; 80: 215-9
2. Metcalf TJ, Osborn LM, Mariani EM. Circumcision: a study of current practices. Clin Pediatr 1983; 22: 575-9
3. MacCarthey D, Douglas JQB. Circumcision in a national sample of 40-year old children. Br Med J 1952; 2: 755-6
4. Leitch IO. Circumcision. A continuing enigma. Aust Paediatr J 1970; 6: 59-65
5. Fergusson DM, Lawton JM, Shannon FT. Neonatal circumcision and penile problems: an 8-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics 1988; 81: 537-41
6. Øster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish school-boys. Arch Dis Child 1968; 43: 200-3
7. Kayaba H, Tamura H, Kitajima S, Fujiwara Y, Kato T, Kato T. Analysis of shape and retractibility of the prepuce in 603 Japanese boys. J Urol 1996; 156: 1813-5
8. Tanner JM. Growth at Adolescence. 2nd Edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science. 1962
9. Wynder EL, Licklider SD. The question of circumcision. Cancer 1960; 13: 442-5
10. Patel H. The problem of routine circumcision. Can Med Ass J 1966; 95: 576-81
11. Herzog LW, Alvarez SR. The frequency of foreskin problems in uncircumcised children. Am J Dis Child 1986; 140: 254-6
12. Alter GJ, Horton CE Jr, Horton CE Jr. Buried penis as a contraindication for circumcision. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178: 487-90.
13. Little JR. The inconspicuous or 'disappearing' penis. Pediatrics 1994; 94: 240-242
14. Redman JF. Circumcision revision in prepubertal boys: analysis of a 2-year experience and description of a technique. J Urol 1995; 153: 180-2
15. Breuer GS, Walfisch S. Circumcision complications and indications for ritual recircumcision-clinical experience and review of the literature. Isr J Med Sci 1987; 23: 252-6
16. Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983; 19: 289-92
17. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314-7
18. Baskin LS, Canning DA, Snyder HM, Duckett JW. Treating complications of circumcision. Pediatr Emerg Care 1996; 12: 62-8
19. Attalla MF, Taweela MN. Pathogenesis of post-circumcision adhesions. Pediatr Surg Int 1994; 9: 103-5
20. Gracely-Kilgore KA. Penile adhesion: the hidden complication of circumcision. Nurse Pract 1984; 9: 22-4
21. Sathaye UV, Goswami AK, Sharma SK. Skin bridge - a complication of paediatric circumcision. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 214
22. Marks MB. Preputial adhesions in the circumcised penis. Arch Pediatr 1939; 56: 458-9
23. Wright JE. Further to 'the further fate of the foreskin'. Update on the natural history of the foreskin. Med J Aust 1994; 160: 134-5
24. American Academy of Pediatrics. Newborns: Care of the Uncircumcised Penis. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1994
25. Klauber GT, Boyle J. Preputial skin-bridging. Complication of circumcision. Urology 1974; 3: 722-3
26. Ritchey ML, Bloom DA. Re: Skin bridge - a complication of paediatric circumcision. Br J Urol 1991; 68: 331
27. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996; 77: 291-95
28. Kaweblum YA, Press S, Kogan L, Levine M, Kaweblum M. Circumcision using the Mogen clamp. Clin Pediatr Phila 1984; 23: 679-82
29. Rickwood AM, Hemalatha V, Batcup G, Spitz L. Phimosis in boys. Br J Urol 1980; 52: 147-50
30. Woolsey G. Applied Surgical Anatomy. New York: Lea Brothers, 1902: 405-407
31. Parkash S, Jeyakumar S, Subramanyan K, Chaudhuri S. Human subpreputial collection: its nature and formation. J Urol 1973; 110: 211-2