The mapping of terrain visibility

Cartographic Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 87-91

  Miller, David R ^a   Law, Alistair N R ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; MAPPING; TERRAIN; VISIBILITY;

UK, SCOTLAND;

EID: 0031403022     PISSN: 00087041     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/caj.1997.34.2.87     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields, Environment and Planning B, 6, pp. 47-65.
2. Bishop, I. (1986). Zones of visual influence. Journal of Environmental Management, 34.
3. Brown, T. C., and Daniel, T. C. (1987). Context effects in perceived environmental quality assessment: scene selection and landscape quality ratings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(4), pp. 283-291.
4. Coeterier, J. F. (1994). Cues for the perception of the size of space in landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 42(4), pp. 333-348.
5. Culbertson, K., Hershberger, B., Jackson, S., Mullen, S., and Olson, H. (1994). Geographic information systems as a tool for regional planning in mountain regions: case studies from Canada, Brazil, Japan and the USA. In, Mountain Environments and Geographic Information Systems, (Eds. M. F. Price and D. I. Heywood), Chapter 6, pp. 99-119, Taylor and Francis.
6. Dickinson, H. J. (1990). Deriving a method for Evaluating the use of geographic Information in Decision Making. NCGIA Technical Report 90-3. pp. 55.
7. ESRI, Inc., (1994). Grid User's Manual. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Redlands, California.
8. Fisher, P. F. (1994) Stretching the viewshed. In, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Edinburgh, UK. pp. 725-73
9. Golany, G. S. (1995), Ethics and Urban Design: Culture, Form and Environment. Wiley, New York. pp. 259.
10. Franklin, W. R., and Ray, C. K. (1994), Higher isn't necessarily better: visibility algorithms and experiments, In, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Edinburgh, UK. pp. 751-770.
11. Hetherington, A., Daniel, T. C., and Brown, T. C. (1993), Is motion more important than it sounds? The medium of presentation in environmental perception research, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(4), pp. 283-291.
12. Kliskey, A. D., and Kearsley, G. W. (1993), Mapping multiple perceptions of wilderness in southern New Zealand, Applied Geography, 13, pp. 203-223.
13. Kliskey, A. D., Hoogsteden, C. C., and Morgan, R. K. (1994), The application of spatial-perceptual wilderness mapping to protected areas Management in New Zealand, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 37(4), pp. 431-445.
14. Land Use Consultants (1990), Landscape Assessment: principles and practice. A Report to the Countryside Commission for Scotland.
15. Lee, J. (1991), Visibility dominance and topographic features on digital elevation models, in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Charleston, SC, USA. pp. 622-631.
16. McLaren, R. A., and Kennie, T. J. M. (1989), Visualisation of digital terrain models: techniques and applications, in Three dimensional applications in geographic information systems (Ed. J. Raper), pp. 79-98. Taylor and Francis: London.
17. Miller, D. R., Motrice, J. G., Whitworth, P. L., and Aspinall, R. J. (1994), The use of GIS for the analysis of scenery in the Cairngorm Mountains, in, GIS in Mountainous Regions, (Eds. I. Heywood and M. Price), Chapter 7, pp. 120-131. Taylor and Francis. Ordnance Survey (1995), Digital Data Catalogue, Ordnance Survey, Southampton.
18. Orland, B. (1994), Visualization techniques for incorporation in forest planning geographic information systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 30, pp. 83-97.
19. Sadalla, E. K., and Oxley, D. (1984), The perception of room size: the rectangularity illusion. Environment and Behavior. 16. pp. 394-405.
20. The Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Assessment (1995), Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment. E and FN Spon, London, pp. 126.
21. Zube, E. H. (1974), Cross disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description and evaluation of landscape resources, Environment and Behaviour, 6, pp. 69-89.
22. Zubin, D. (1989), A model for scale differentiation of spatially distributed percepts, in, Language of spatial relations: Initiative two specialist meeting report. (Eds. D. Mark, A. U. Frank, M. J. Egenhofer, S. Freundschuh, M. McGranagham, and R. M. White), NCGIA Technical Paper 89-2.