Hemodynamic consequences of replacing the aorta by vascular grafts simulated in a mathematical model

Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation

Volumn 34, Issue , 1997, Pages 263-268

  Schulz, Stephan ^a   Bauernschmitt, Robert ^a   Schwarzhaupt, Andreas ^b   Vahl, C F ^a   Kiencke, Uwe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic input impedance; Aortic prosthesis; Mathematical model; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESES; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; GRAFTS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY;

AORTIC INPUT IMPEDANCE;

HEMODYNAMICS;

AORTA; AORTA FLOW; AORTA PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELASTICITY; HEMODYNAMICS; IMPEDANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; SIMULATION;

EID: 0031402983     PISSN: 00678856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Urschel CW, Covell JW, Sonnenblick EH, Ross J, Braunwald E. Effect of decreased aortic compliance on performance of the left ventricle. Am J Physiol 1968;11:319-28
2. Kinely C, Marble AE. Compliance: a continuing problem with vascular grafts. J Cardiovasc Surg 1980;21:163-70
3. Morita S, Kuboyama I, Asou T, Tokunaga K, Nose Y, Nakamura M, Harasawa Y, Sunagawa K. The effect of extraanatomic bypass on aortic input impedance studied in open chest dogs. Should the vascular prosthesis be compliant to unload the left ventricle? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:774-83
4. Kim SY, Hinkamp TJ, Jacobs WR, Lichtenberg RC, Posniak H, Pifarre R. Effect of an inelastic aortic synthetic vascular graft on exercise hemodynamics. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:981-9
5. Maeta H, Hori M. Effects of a lack of aortic "Windkessel" properties on the left ventricle. Jpn Circ J 1985;49:232-7
6. Kelly R, Fitchett D. Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:952-63
7. Karamanoglu M, Gallagher DE, Avolio AP, O'Rourke MF. Functional origin of reflected pressure waves in a multibranched model of the human arterial system. Am J Physiol 1994;267:H1681-8
8. Burnette RR. Computer simulation of human blood flow and vascular resistance. Comput Biol Med 1996;26(5):363-9
9. Avolio AP. Multi-branched model of the human arterial system. Med Biol Eng Comput 1980; 18:709-18
10. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA. Effects of exercise on aortic input impedance and pressure wave forms in normal humans. Circ Res 1981;48:334-43
11. Pouler H, Covell JW, Ross J. Effect of alteration in aortic input impedance on the force-velocity-length relationship in the intact canine heart. Circ Res 1979;45:126-35
12. Appleyard RF, Sauvage LR. Haemodynamic consequences of arteriel replacement with a synthetic graft. Cardiovasc Res 1986;20:26-35
13. Dujardin JP, Stone DN, Paul LT, Pieper HP. Response of systemic arterial input impedance to volume expansion and hemorrhage. Am J Physiol 1980;238:H902-8
14. Schulz S, Bauernschmitt R. Albers J, Riesenberg A, Schwarzhaupt A, Vahl CF, Kiencke U. A mathematical high-time-resolution model of the arterial system under extracorporeal circulation. Biomed Sci Instrum 1997;33:406-11
15. Stergiopulos N, Meister JJ, Westerhof N. Scatter in input impedance spectrum may result from the elastic nonlinearity of the arterial wall. Am J Physiol 1995;269:H1490-5
16. Liu Z, Brin KP, Yin FCP. Estimation of total arterial compliance. An improved method and evaluation of current methods. Am J Physiol 1986;251:H588-H600
17. Capello A, Gnudi G, Lamberti C. Identification of the three-element windkessel model incorporation a pressure-dependent compliance. Ann Biomed Eng 1995;23:164-77