Primary, return and onward migration in the U.S. and Canada: Is there a difference?

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 175-198

  Newbold, K Bruce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA; MIGRATION PATTERN; MODELLING APPROACH; THEORY;

ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS; DEMOGRAPHY; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; METHODOLOGY; MIGRATION; MIGRATION--DETERMINANTS; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; POPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RESEARCH; RETURN MIGRATION--DETERMINANTS; STUDIES; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE;

AMERICAS; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; MIGRATION--DETERMINANTS; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; POPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; RETURN MIGRATION--DETERMINANTS; STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAS; CANADA; DEMOGRAPHY; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EMIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION; NORTH AMERICA; POPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

CANADA; USA;

EID: 0031401875     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1997.tb00688.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S.R. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
2. DaVanzo, J. 1976. Differences between return and nonreturn migrants: An econometric analysis. International Migration Review, 10:13-27.
3. DaVanzo, J. 1981. Repeat migration, information costs and location-specific capital. Population and Environment, 4:45-73.
4. Frey, W.H. 1995. Inmigration and internal migration flight: a California case study. Population and Environment, 16:353-375.
5. Grant, E.K., and Vanderkamp, J. 1986. Repeat migration and disappointment. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 9:299-322.
6. Greenwood, M.J. 1988. Changing patterns of migration and regional economic growth in the U.S.: A demographic perspective. Growth and Change, 19:68-87.
7. Kanaroglou, P., K.L. Liaw and Y.Y Papageorgiou. 1986. An Analysis of Migratory Systems: 2. Operational Framework. Environment and Planning A, 18:1039-1060.
8. Liaw, K.L. 1990. Joint effects of personal factors and ecological variables on the interprovincial migration pattern of young adults in Canada. Geographical Analysis, 22:189-208.
9. Long, L. 1988. Migration and Residential Mobility in the United States, New York: Russell Sage.
10. Long, L. and Boertlein, C. 1976. The geographical mobility of Americans - an international comparison, Current Population Reports Series P-23, no. 64. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
11. Long, L. and Hansen, K.A. 1977. Interdivisional primary, return and repeat migration. Public Data Use, 5:3-10.
12. McCullagh, P. 1983. Quasi-Likelihood Functions The Annals of Statistics, 11:59-67.
13. Milne, W.J. 1992. Macroeconomic influences on migration. Regional Studies, 27:365-73.
14. Morrison, P.A. 1971. Chronic movers and the future redistribution of population. Demography, 8:171-184.
15. Newbold, K.B. 1994. A description and interpretation of changing primary, return and onward interprovincial migrations in Canada: 1976 to 1986. The Great Lakes Geographer, 1:1-20.
16. Newbold, K.B. 1996. Income, self-selection, and return and onward interprovincial migration in Canada. Environment and Planning A, 28:1019-1034.
17. Newbold, K.B. and Liaw, K.L. 1990. Characterization of primary, return and onward interprovincial migration in Canada: Overall and age-specific patterns. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 13:17-34.
18. Newbold, K.B. and Liaw, K.L. 1994. Return and onward interprovincial migration through economic boom and bust in Canada, from 1976-81 to 1981-86. Geographical Analysis, 26: 228-245.
19. Pellegrini, P.A. and A.S. Fotheringham. 1996. Disaggregate migration modeling: A comparison of microdata sources for the U.S., UK and Canada. Area, 28: 347-357.
20. Plane, D. and P. Rogerson. 1994. The Geographical Analysis of Population. New York: Wiley.
21. Rogers, A. 1990. Return migration to region of birth among retirement-age persons in the United States. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45:S128-134.
22. Rogers, A. and Belanger, A. 1990. The importance of place-of-birth in migration and population redistribution analysis. Environment and Planning A, 22:193-210.
23. Sàenz, R. and Davila, A. 1992. Chicano return migration to the Southwest: an integrated human capital approach. International Migration Review 26:1248-1266.
24. Simmons, J.W. 1982. The stability of migration patterns: Canada, 1966-91 and 1971-1976. Urban Geography, 3:166-178.
25. U.S. Census Bureau. 1995. Geographic Mobility: March 93 to March 94, U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. Yezer, A.M. and Thurston, L. 1976. Migration patterns and income change: implications for the human capital approach to migration. Southern Economic Journal, 42:693-702.
27. Wederburn, R.W.M. 1974. Quasi-Likelihood Functions, Generalized Linear Models and the Gauss-Newton Method. Biometrika, 61:439-447.
28. Zelinsky, W. 1971. The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 41:219-249.