Model of electrical conductivity distribution across central europe

Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity

Volumn 49, Issue 11-12, 1997, Pages 1585-1600

  Ceiw, Vaclav ^a   Kovacikova, Svëtlana ^a   Pek, Josef ^a   Pëcova, Jana ^a   Praus, Oldfich ^a  

^a GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY;

EUROPE, (CENTRAL);

EID: 0031401370     PISSN: 00221392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adam, A. J. Verö, and A. Wallner, Regional properties of geomagnetic induction arrows in Europe, Ada Geod. Geophys. et Montan. Acad. Sei. Hung. 7 (3-4), 251-287, 1972.
2. Adam, A. L. L. Vanyan, D. A. Varlamov, I. V. Yegorov, A. P. Shilovski, and P. P. Shilovski, Depth of crustal conducting layer and asthenosphere in the Pannonian basin determined by magnetotellurics, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 28, 251-260, 1982.
3. Banks, R. J. The interpretation of the Northumberland trough geomagnetic variation anomaly using two-dimen-sional current models, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 87, 595-616, 1986.
4. Banks, R. J. and D. Beamish, Local and regional induction in the British Isles, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 79, 539-553, 1984.
5. Calotä, F. I. Càltan, A. lonescu, A. Soare, and V. Çteflea, înregistrari de variaÇii geomagnetice pe teritoriul României (Partea I), Stud. Cere. Geol. Geogr. Geofiz. Ser. Geofiz. 9, 323-331, 1971.
6. Dudek, A. The crystalline basement block of the Outer Carpathians in Moravia: Brunovistulicum, Rozpr. Cs. Akad. Véd, R. mat. pfj'r. vëd, Praha, 90, 1-85, 1980.
7. Guterch, A. U. Luosto, M. Grad, J. Yliniemi, E. Gaczynski, H. Korhonen, T. Janik, P. Lindblom, R. Materzok, and E. Perchuc, Seismic studies of crustal structure in the Teisseyre-Tornquist zone in Northwestern Poland (Preliminary report), Publs. Inst. Geophys. Pol. Acad. Sei. A-19 (236), 147-156, 1991.
8. Jankowski, J. V. Petr, J. Pëcovâ, and O. Praus, Induction vector estimates in the Polish-Czechoslovak part of the Carpathians, Studia geoph. et geod. 23, 89-93, 1979.
9. Jankowski, J. Z. Tarlowski, O. Praus, J. Pëcovâ, and V. Petr, The results of deep geomagnetic soundings in the West Carpathians, Geoph. J. Roy. astr. Soc. 80, 561-574, 1985.
10. Jankowski, J. J. Pawliszyn, W. Jözwiak, and T. Ernst, Synthesis of electrical conductivity surveys performed on the Polish part of the Carpathians with geomagnetic and magnetotelluric sounding methods, Publs. Inst. Geophys. Pol. Acad. Sei. A-19 (236), 183-214, 1991.
11. Kovâcikovâ, S. V. Cerv, and O. Praus, Modelling of geomagnetic transfer functions on the eastern margin of the Bohemian Massif, Ann. Geophys. Suppl. I to Vol. 15, 15 C 159, 1997.
12. Majorowicz, J..S. Plewa, and M. Wesierska, The terrestrial thermal field in Poland, in Geoelectric and Geothermal Studies, edited by A. Adam, pp. 402-413, KAPG Geophysical Monograph, Akadémiai Kiadô, Budapest, 1976.
13. Mîsaf, Z. and A. Dudek, Some critical events in the geological history of eastern margin of the Bohemian Massif, J. Czech Geol. Soc. 38, 9-20, 1993.
14. Misaf, Z. A. Dudek, V. Havlena, and J. Weiss, Geologie USSR I, Cesky Masiv, pp. 11-23, SPN Praha, 1983.
15. Petr, V. J. Pëcovâ, and O. Praus, Induction vector estimates in the Bohemian Massif and in the transition zone to the Carpathians, Studia geoph. et geod. 26, 172-177, 1984.
16. Pëcovâ, J. and O. Praus, Anomalous induction zones in the Czech Republic in relation to large scale European anomalies, Studia geoph. et geod. 40, 50-76, 1996.
17. Porstendorfer, G. W. Göthe, K. Lengning, Ch. Oelsner, R. Tanzer, and E. Ritter, Nature and possible causes of the anomalous behaviour of electric conductivity in the North of the GDR, Poland and the FRG, in Geoelectric and Geothermal Studies, edited by A. Adam, pp. 487-500, KAPG Geophysical Monograph, Akadémiai Kiadô, Budapest, 1976.
18. Praus, O. and J. Pëcovâ, Anomalous geomagnetic fields of internal origin in Czechoslovakia, Studia geoph. et geod.35, 81-89, 1991.
19. Praus, O. and M. Tobyâsovâ, Electrical conductance of sediments overlaying the basement of the Czech Republic, Studia geoph. et geod. 36, 161-167, 1992.
20. Rokityanski, 1.1..Investigation of Electrical Conductivity Anomalies by the Method of Magnetovariation Profiling, pp. 131-133, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1975 (in Russian).
21. Schmucker, U. Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the southwestern United States, Bull, of the Scripps Inst. of Oceanography. University of California Press, 13, 13-32, 1970.
22. Shilova, A. M. and S. I. Sanin, Conductivity of the Sedimentary Cover over the Carpathian Region, pp. 1-3, AN SSSR, IZMIRAN, 1982.
23. Suk, M. Regional geological division of the Bohemian Massif, Exploration Geophysics, Remote Sensing and Environment, II, No. 2, 25-30, 1995.
24. Suk, M. M. Blfzkovsky, T. Buday, I. Chlupâc, I. Cicha, A. Dudek, J. Dvorak, M. Elias, V. Holub, J. Ibrmajer, O. Kodym, Z. Kukal, M. Malkovsky, E. Mencfk, V. Müller, J. Tyräcek, Z. Vejnar, and A. Zeman, Geological History of the Territory of the Czech Socialist Republic, pp. 65-81, Geological Survey, Prague, 1984.
25. Vasseur, G. and P. Weidelt, Bimodal EM induction in non-uniform thin sheets with an application to the Northern .Pyrenean Anomaly, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 51, 669-690, 1977.
26. Weiss, J. Basis of the Moravian block in the structure of the East European platform, Folia Univ. Purkyn. brun. Geol, 18, 5-64, 1977 (in Czech).
27. Wiese, H. Geomagnetische Tiefentellurik Teil II: Die Streichrichtung der Untergrundstrukturen des elektrischen Widerstandes, erschlossen aus geomagnetischen Variationen, Geofisica pura e applicata, 52, 83-103, 1962.