Attempt and success rates for vaginal birth after Caesarean section in relation to complications of the previous pregnancy

Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1997, Pages 63-72

  Holt, Victoria L ^a   Mueller, Beth A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANAMNESIS; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; GENITAL HERPES; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NORMAL HUMAN; PELVIC DISEASE; PLACENTA DISORDER; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 0031401088     PISSN: 02695022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.11.s1.9.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rates of cesarean delivery - United States, 1993. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1995; 44:303-307.
2. Norman P. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (commentary). Lancet 1995; 345:142.
3. Committee on Obstetrics: Maternal-fetal Medicine. Statement on Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC). Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1988.
4. Pitkin RM. Once a cesarean? (editorial) Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991; 77:939.
5. Public Health Service. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service 1991; DHHS publication no. (PHS)91-50212.
6. Paterson CM, Saunders NJ. Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. British Medical Journal 1991; 303:818-821.
7. Jakobi P, Weissman A, Peretz BA, Hocherman I. Evaluation of prognostic factors for vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1993; 38:729-733.
8. Kirk EP, Doyle KA, Leigh J, Garrard ML. Vaginal birth after cesarean or repeat cesarean section: Medical risks or social realities? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990; 162:1398-1405.
9. Targett C. Caesarean section and trial of scar. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1988; 28:249-262.
10. Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990; 76:750-754.
11. Jarrell MA, Ashmead GG, Mann LI. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section: A five-year study. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1985; 65:628-632.
12. Ollendorff DA, Goldberg JM, Minogue JP, Min D, Socol ML. Vaginal birth after cesarean section for arrest of labor: Is success determined by maximum cervical dilatation during the prior labor? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988; 159:636-639.
13. Davies JA, Spencer JAD. Trial of scar. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 1988; 40:379381.
14. Hadley CB, Mennuti MT, Gabbe SG. An evaluation of the relative risks of a trial of labor vs. elective repeat cesarean section. American Journal of Perinatology 1986; 3:107-114.
15. Paul RH, Phelan JP, Yeh S. Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1985; 151:297-304.
16. Clark SL, Eglinton GS, Beall M, Phelan JP. Effect of indication of previous cesarean section on subsequent delivery outcome in patients undergoing a trial of labor. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1984; 29:22-25.
17. Meier PR, Porreco RP. Trial of labor following cesarean section: A two-year experience. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1982; 144:671-678.
18. Herman AA, McCarthy BJ, Bakewell JM, Ward RH, Mueller B A, Maconochie NE et al. Data linkage methods used in maternally-linked birth and infant death surveillance data sets from the United States (Georgia, Missouri, Utah and Washington State), Israel, Norway, Scotland and Western Australia. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 1997; 11(Suppl. 1), 5-22.
19. Dean AG, Dean JA, Burton AH, Dicker RC. Epi Info, Version 5: a Word Processing, Database, and Statistics Program for Epidemiology on Microcomputers. Stone Mountain, Georgia: USD, Incorporated, 1990.
20. Parrish KM, Holt VL, Connell FA, Williams B, LoGerfo JP. Variations in the accuracy of obstetric procedures and diagnoses on birth records in Washington State, 1989. American Journal of Epidemiology 1993; 138:119-127.