A resource model of computer-mediated political life

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 519-534

  Wilhelm, Anthony G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MODELLING APPROACH; RESOURCES ACCESS; TECHNOLOGY ACCESS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY;

USA;

EID: 0031400682     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1997.tb00038.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, R. H., Bikson, T. K., Law, S. A., & Mitchell, B. M. (1995). Universal access to e-mail: Feasibility and societal implications. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
2. Bagdikian, B. H. (1997). The media monopoly (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon.
3. Blackburn, M. L., Bloom, D. E., & Freeman, R. B. (1989). The declining economic position of lessskilled American males. NBER Working Paper No. 3186. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. Case, A. C., & Katz, L. F. (1991). The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youth. NBER Working Paper No. 3705. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
5. Chen, M. (1986). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 293, 265-281.
6. Civille, R. (1995). The internet and the poor. In B. Kahin & J. Keller (Eds.), Public access to the Internet (pp. 175-207). Cambridge, MA: MTT Press.
7. Cooper, M. N. (1996). Universal service: A historical perspective and policies for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: The Consumer Federation of America and the Benton Foundation.
8. Cottrell, J. (1992). I'm a stranger here myself: A consideration of women in computing. In Learning from the past, stepping into the future (pp. 71-76). New York, NY: The Association of Computing Machinery.
9. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Free Press.
10. Drake, W. J. (1995). The turning point. In W. J. Drake (Ed.), The new information infrastructure: Strategies for US. policy (pp. 1-27). New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund Press.
11. Drucker, P. F. (1990). New technology: Predicting its impact. In A. H. Teich (Ed.), Technology and the future (pp. 159-163). New York: St Martin's Press.
12. Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
13. Dutton, W. H. (1996). Network rules of order: Regulating speech in public electronic fora. Media, Culture & Society, 18, 269-290.
14. Dutton, W. H., Sweet, P. L., & Rogers, E. M. (1989). Sociceconomic status and the early diffusion of personal computing in the United States. Social Science Computer Review, 7 (3), 259-272.
15. Gardner, J. R., McEwen, A., & Curry, C. A. (1986). A sample survey of attitudes to computer studies. Computers and Education, 10 (2), 293-298.
16. Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (1995). The decline of noncompeting groups: Changes in the premium to education, 1890 to 1940. NBER Working Paper No. 5202. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17. Golding, P. (1997). World wide wedge: Division and contradiction in the global information infrastructure. Monthly Review, 48(3), 70-85.
18. Guthrie, K. K., & Dutton, W. H. (1992). The politics of citizen access technology: The development of public information utilities in four cities. Policy Studies Journal, 20(4), 574-597.
19. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, vol. 2 (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon.
20. Hacker, K. L. (1996). Missing links in the evolution of electronic democratization. Media, Culture & Society, 18, 213-232.
21. Herring, S. (1994, June 27). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: Bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier. Paper presented at the American Library Association annual convention, Miami, FL.
22. Hess, R. S., & Miura, I. T. (1985). Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps. Sex Roles, 13(3/4), 165-180.
23. Hirschkop, K. (1997). Democracy and new technologies. Monthly Review, 48(1), 86-98.
24. Information Infrastructure Task Force. (1993). The national information infrastructure: Agenda for action. Washington, DC: Information Infrastructure Task Force.
25. Jefferson, T. (1787/1975). Letter to Edward Carrington. In M .D. Peterson (Ed.), The portable Thomas Jefferson (pp. 414-415). New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
26. Krendl, K. A., Brohier, M. C., & Fleetwood, C. (1989). Children and computers: Do sex-related differences persist? Journal of Communication, 39 (3), 85-93.
27. McChesney, R. W. (1997). Corporate media and the threat to democracy. New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.
28. McConnaughey, J. (1997). Access to the information highway. In H. Kubicek, W. H. Dutton, & R. Williams (Eds.), The social shaping of information highways: European and American roads to the information society (pp. 221-231). New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
29. Miller, S. E. (1996). Civilizing cyberspace: Policy, power and the information superhighway. New York, NY: CM Press.
30. Mueller, M., & Schement, J. R. (1995). Universal service from the bottom up: A profile of telecommunications access in Camden, New Jersey [on-line]. Available: http://www.bell.com.
31. Murdock, G., & Golding, P. (1989). Information poverty and political inequality: Citizenship in the age of privatized communications. Journal of Communication, 39 (3), 180-195.
32. Pool, I. S. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Reich, R. B. (1991). The work of nations. New York, NY: Vintage.
34. Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, I. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York, NY: MacMillan.
35. Schement, J. R. (1993). Beyond universal service: Characteristics of Americans without telephones, 1980-1993. Washington, DC: The Benton Foundation.
36. Schiller, H. I. (1989). Culture, inc.: The corporate takeover of public expression. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37. Schiller, H. L (1996). Information inequality: The deepening social crisis in America. New York, NY: Routledge.
38. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39. Spertus, E. (1991). Why are there so few female computer scientists? Cambridge, MA: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
40. The Third International Mathematics and Science Study. (1997). [on-line]. Available: http://www.ed.gov/NCES/timss/.
41. United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1997). The social context of education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
42. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Race, ethnicity and political resources: Participation in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 23, 453-497.
44. Wilhelm, A. G. (1996). Creative destruction in the information age: The fallout on America's Latino communities. Trotter Review, 9 (2), 14-18.
45. Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), Information and communication technologies: Visions and realities (pp. 53-67). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46. World Institute on Disability. (1994). Building the framework: Telecommunications and persons with disabilities [on-line]. Available: http://www.igc.org.