Comparison of different regimens of electrical stimulation applied to nonmobilized and newly mobilized latissimus dorsi muscle

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 343-353

  Chekanov, Valeri S ^a,b   Rieder, Michelle A ^a   Tchekanov, Guennady V ^a   Smith, Luke M ^a   Eisenstein, Ruben ^a   Schmidt, Donald H ^a  

^a Milwaukee Heart Surgery Associates   (United States)

^b AURORA SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATISSIMUS DORSI MUSCLE; MUSCLE BIOPSY; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE EXCITATION; MUSCLE FATIGUE; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; NONHUMAN; SHEEP;

EID: 0031400021     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1997.tb00149.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Carpentier A, Chachques JC: Myocardial substitution with a stimulated skeletal muscle: First successful clinical case. Lancet 1985;8840: 1279.
2. Magovern GJ, Pars SB, Magovern GJ Jr, et al: Latissimus dorsi as a functioning synchronously paced muscle component in the repair of a left ventricular aneurysm. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;41:116.
3. Moreira LF, Bocchi EA, Bucal F, et al: Present trends in clinical experience with dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Artif Organs 1995;19:211-216.
4. Chachques JC, Carpentier AF: The scientific development of dynamic cardiomyoplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;10:1154-1155.
5. Jegaden O, Delahaye F, Finet G, et al: Late hemodynamic results after cardiomyoplasty in congestive heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1151-1157.
6. Chekanov VS, Krakovsky AA, Pekarsky VV: Cardiomyoplasty: Early and late results. In Carpentier A, Chachques JC, Grandjean PA (eds): Cardiac Bioassist. Armonk, NY, Futura Publishing Company, Inc., 1997, pp. 115-123.
7. Isoda S, Yano Y, Yasuyuki J, et al: Influence of delay on latissimus dorsi muscle flap blood flow. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:632-638.
8. Carroll SM, Carroll CMA, Stremel RW, et al: Vascular delay of the latissimus dorsi muscle: An essential component of cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1034-1040.
9. Kratz JM, Johnson WS, Mukherjee R, et al: The relationship between latissimus dorsi skeletal muscle structure and contractile function after cardiomyoplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:868-878.
10. Chachques JC, Berrebi A, Hernigou A, et al: Study of muscular and ventricular function in dynamic cardiomyoplasty: A ten-year follow-up. J Heart Lung Transplant 1997;16:854-868.
11. Mannion JD, Magno MG, Buckman PD, et al: Acute electrical stimulation increases extramyocardial collateral blood flow after a cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;6:1351-1358.
12. Moreira LF, Stolf NAG, Braile DM, et al: Dynamic cardiomyoplasty in South America. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:408-12.
13. Magovern GJ, Simpson KA. Clinical cardiomyoplasty: review of the ten year United States experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:413-419.
14. Chiu KCJ, Odim JNK, Burgess JH: Responses to dynamic cardiomyoplasty for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1993;72: 475-479.
15. Jarvinen M, Einola S, Virtanen E: Effect of position of immobilzation upon the tensile properties of the rat gastrocnemius muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:253-257.
16. You YM, Landymore RW, Eris J: Delayed stimulation of the latissimus dorsi may result in disuse atrophy. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:404-409.
17. Van Der Veen FH, Dassen WRM, Havenith G, et al: In vivo contraction analyses as a measure of canine latissimus dorsi muscle adaptation following chronic electrical stimulation. In Chiu RC-J, Bourgeois I, (eds): Transformed Muscle for Cardiac Assist and Repair. Mount Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing Company, Inc., 1990, pp. 105-115.
18. Van Doom CAM, Bhabra MS, Hopkinson DN, et al. Latissimus dorsi muscle blood flow during synchronized contraction: Implications for cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:603-609.