Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion IV. Influence of tablet excipients, surfactants and salts on the observed mucoadhesion of polymers

European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 65-71

  Tobyn, Michael J ^a,c   Johnson, James R ^a   Dettmar, Peter W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b Technol Res Reckitt Colman Prod   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Excipients; Formulation; Gastric tissue; Hydrogen bonding; Mucoadhesion; Polyacrylic acid; Texture analyzer

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYPROPYL BETA CYCLODEXTRIN; AEROSIL; BETA CYCLODEXTRIN; CALCIUM CHLORIDE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE DIBASIC; CARBOMER; CETYLPYRIDINIUM SALT; CHOLESTEROL; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; EXCIPIENT; KELTROL GF; LACTOSE; MAGNESIUM STEARATE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; POLOXAMER; POLYACRYLIC ACID; POLYMER; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SORBITAN STEARATE; SUCROSE; SURFACTANT; TALC; TRITON X 705; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XANTHAN;

ADHESION; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; NONHUMAN; STOMACH MUCOSA; SWINE; TABLET FORMULATION;

EID: 0031398809     PISSN: 09396411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0939-6411(96)00009-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Tobyn MJ, Johnson JR, Dettmar PW. Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion I. Instrumental parameters and experimental conditions. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1995;41(4):235-41.
2. Tobyn MJ, Johnson JR, Dettmar PW. Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion II. Physical properties of polymers. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1996;42(1):56-61.
3. Perez-Marcos B, Iglesias R, Gomezamosa JL, Marinez-Pachecho, R, Souto C, Concheiro A. Usefulness of certain varieties of Carbomer in the formulation of hydrophilic furosemide matrices. Int. J. Pharm. 1991;67:113-21.
4. Perez-Marcos B, Iglesias R, Gomezamosa JL, Marinez-Pachecho R, Souto C, Concheiro A. Mechanical and drug-release properties of atenolol-Carbomer hydrophillic matrix tablets. J. Control. Release 1991;17:267-76.
5. Harris D, Fell JT, Sharma HL, Taylor DC. GI transit of potential bioadhesive systems in the rat. J. Control. Release 1990;12:55-65.
6. Tobyn MJ, Johnson JR, Dettmar PW. Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion III influence of polymer addition on the observed mucoadhesion of some materials. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1996;42:331-335.
7. Tobyn MJ. Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion, Ph.D. thesis, University of Strathclyde, 1994.
8. Ponchel G, Touchard F, Duchêne D, Peppas NA, Bioadhesive analysis of controlled release systems. I. Fracture and interpenetration analysis in poly (acrylic acid)-containing systems. J. Control. Release 1987;5:129-41.
9. Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. Multiple comparison procedures. New York: Wiley, 1987:66.
10. Hafeez Hussain MS, York P. Timmins P. A study of the formation of magnesium stearate film on sodium chloride using energy dispersive X-ray analysis. Int. J. Pharm. 1988;42:89-95.
11. Johansson ME. Investigations of the mixing time dependence of the lubricating properties of granular and powdered magnesium stearate. Acta Pharm. Suec. 1985;22:343-50.
12. Mortazavi SA, Smart JD. An investigation into the role of water movement and mucus gel hydration in mucoadhesion. J. Control. Release 1993;25:197-203.
13. Chen W-G, Hwang C-CH. Adhesive and in vitro release characteristics of a propranolol bioadhesive disc system. Int. J. Pharm. 1992;82:61-6.
14. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, 2nd edition. A, Wade and P.J. Weller (Eds). Pharmaceutical Press (London) 1994.
15. Jones SP, Grant DJW, Hadgraft J, Parr GD. Cyclodextrins in the pharmaceutical sciences. Part I: preparation, structure and properties of cyclodextrins and cyclodextrin inclusion compounds. Acta Pharm. Technol. 1984;30(3):213-33.
16. Baszkin A, Proust JA, Monsengo P, Boissonade MM. Wettability of polymers by mucin aqueous solutions. Biorheology 1990;27:503-14.
17. Lehr C-M, Bouwstra JA, Boddé HE, Junginger HE. A surface energy analysis of mucoadhesion: contact angle measurements on polycarbophil and pig intestinal mucosa in physiologically relevant fluids. Pharm. Res. 1992;9(1):70-5.
18. Boddé HE, Bouwstra JA, Junginger HE. Bioadhesive polymers-surface energy and molecular energy mobility considerations. Biofouling 1991;4:163-9.
19. de Vries ME, Boddé HE, Busscher HJ, Junginger HE. Hydrogels for buccal drug delivery: properties relevant for mucoadhesion. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1988;22:1023-32.
20. Mikos AG, Peppas NA. Measurement of the surface tension of mucin solutions. Int. J. Pharm. 1989;53:1-5.
21. Rillosi M, Buckton G. Modeling mucoadhesion by use of surface energy terms obtained by the Lewis acid-Lewis base relationship. Int. J. Pharm. 1995;117(1):75-84.
22. Rillosi M, Buckton G. Modelling mucoadhesion by use of surface energy terms obtained from the Lewis acid-Lewis base approach. II. Studies on anionic, cationic and unionisable polymers. Pharm. Res. 1995;12(5):669-75.
23. Esposito P, Colombo I, Lovrecich M. Investigation of surface properties of some polymers by a thermodynamic and mechanical approach: possibility of predicting mucoadhesion. Biomaterials 1994;15(3):177-82.
24. Spychal RT, Marrero JM, Saverymutto SH, Northfield TC. Measurement of surface hydrophobicity of human gastrointestinal mucosa. Gastroenterology 1989;97:104-11.
25. Pritchard WH. The role of hydrogen bonding in adhesion. In: D. Alder, editor. Aspects of adhesion. London: London University Press, 1970;6:11-23.
26. Leung S-HS, Robinson JR. Polymer structural features contributing to mucoadhesion II. J. Control. Release 1990;12:187-94.
27. Lejoyeux F, Ponchel G, Woussidjewe D, Peppas NA, Duchène D. Bioadhesive tablets: influence of testing medium composition on bioadhesion. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1992;15(12):2037-48.