Magnetotelluric Phase Anisotropy above Extensional Structures of the Neogene Pannonian Basin

Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity

Volumn 49, Issue 42686, 1997, Pages 1549-1557

  AdAm A ^a  

^a GEODETIC AND GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; MANTLE STRUCTURE;

HUNGARY, PANNONIAN BASIN;

EID: 0031397555     PISSN: 00221392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5636/jgg.49.1549     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ádám, A., Einige Hypothesen über den Aufbau des oberen Erdmantles in Ungarn, Gerlands Beiträge zur Geophysik, 74, 20-40, 1965.
2. Ádám, A., Appearance of electrical inhomogeneity and anisotropy in the results of the complex electrical exploration of the Carpathian basin, Acta Geod. Geoph. Mont. Hung., 4, 87-97, 1969.
3. Ádám, A. and L. Major, Stabilized high-sensitivity immersion magnetic variometer for magnetotelluric investigations (Type MTV-2), Acta Geod. Geoph. Mont. Hung., 2, 211-215, 1967.
4. Ádám, A., E. Prácser, L. Szarka, and G. Varga, Mantle plumes or EM distortions in the Pannonian Basin? (Inversion of the deep magnetotelluric (MT) soundings along the Pannonian Geotraverse), Geophys. Trans., 40, 45-78, 1996.
5. Bielik, M., Analysis of the stripped gravity map of the Pannonian Basin, Geologickýzbornik-Geologica Carpathica, 39, 99-108, 1988 Buck, W. R., Modes of continental lithospheric extension, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 163-168, 1991.
6. Cagniard, L., Principe de la methode magnetotellurique nouvelle methode de prospection géophysique, Ann. Géophys., 18, 605-635, 1953.
7. Constable, S. C., R. L. Parker, and C. G. Constable, Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic data, Geophysics, 52, 289-300, 1987.
8. Horváth, F., Towards a mechanical model for the formation of the Pannonian Basin, Tectonophysics, 226, 333-357, 1993.
9. Horváth, F. and L. Royden, Mechanism for the formation of the Intra-Carpathian basins: a review, Earth Evol. Sci., 1, 307-316, 1981.
10. Kovácsvölgyi, S., Interpretation of gravity and magnetic anomalies in the Békés basin in the light of recent data, Magyar Geofizika, 35, 90-94, 1994 (in Hungarian).
11. Mareschal, M., R. L. Kellett, R. D. Kurtz, J. N. Ludden, S. Ji, and R. C. Bailey, Archean cratonic roots, mantle shear zones and deep electrical anisotropy, Nature, 375, 134-137, 1995.
12. Nemesi, L. and R. Stomfai, Some supplements to the exploration of the basement of Békés basin, Magyar Geofizika, 33, 70-79, 1992 (in Hungarian).
13. Posgay, K., T. Bodoky, E. Hegedüs, S. Kovdácsvölgyi, K. Lenkey, P. Szafián, E. Takács, Z. Tίmár, and G. Varga, Asthenospheric structure beneath a Neogene basin in southeast Hungary, Tectonophysics, 252, 467-484, 1995.
14. Tari, G., F. Horváth, and J. Rumpler, Styles of extension in the Pannonian Basin, Tectonophysics, 208, 203-219, 1992.
15. Verö, J., On the determination of magnetotelluric impedance tensor, Acta Geod. Geoph. Mont. Hung., 7, 333-351, 1972.
16. Wannamaker, P. E., G. W. Hohman, and S. H. Ward, Magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths, Geophysics, 49, 1517-1533, 1984.