Canker resistance stability of some Cupressus sempervirens clones to Seiridium cardinale

Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 269-277

  Santini, A ^a   Casini, N ^a   Di Lonardo, V ^a   Raddi, P ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coefficient of variability; Cypress canker; Seiridium cardinale; Wricke's ecovalence

Indexed keywords

CANKER; CLONE; EVALUATION; INOCULATION; PARAMETER; PLANT GENETICS; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT;

CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS; SEIRIDIUM CARDINALE;

EID: 0031396939     PISSN: 03949257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AGRIOS, G.N., 1988. Plant pathology. (III Edition). Academic Press Inc., S. Diego, California Ltd., pp. 803.
2. ANDREOLI, C., PANCONESI, A., PONCHET, J. and RADDI, P., 1984. Etude comparée du comportement des cyprès a Florence et à Antibes. Report EUR 9200, pp. 9-20.
3. BENNINGTON, C.C., THAYNE, W.V., 1984. Use and misuse of mixed model analysis of variance in ecological studies. Ecology, 75(3): 717-722.
4. BUSS C., 1966. Statistics in Biology. Vol. I. McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. BRUCK R.I. and MANION, P.D., 1980. Interacting environmental factors associated with the incidence of Hypoxylon canker on trembling aspen. Can. J. For., 10: 17-24.
6. FRANCIS T.R. and KANNENBERG, L.W., 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. 1. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci., 58: 1029-1034.
7. GELLINI, R. and GROSSONI, P., 1980. Aspetti botanici del genere Cupressus. in E.E.C. Agrimed «Il cipresso, malattie e difesa», pp. 27-43 (in Italian).
8. GROSSONI, P. and GELLINI, R., 1984, Ecologia della dormienza delle gemme degli alberi forestall. Inf. Bot. Ital., 69-78 (in Italian).
9. HÜHN, M., 1990. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 1: Theory. Euphytica, 47: 189-194.
10. HÜHN, M., LOTITO, S. and PIEPHO, H.P, 1993. Relationships between genotype x environment interactions and rank orders for a set of genotypes tested in different environments. Theor. Appl. Genet., 86: 943-950.
11. HÜHN, M. and PIEPHO, H.P., 1994. Relationships between Kendall's coefficient of concordance and a nonparametric measure of phenotypic stability with implications for the consistency in rankings as affected by variance components. Biom. J., 36(6): 719-727.
12. KANG, M.S., MILLER, J.D. and DARRAH, L.L., 1987. A note on relationship between stability variance and ecovalence. The Journal of Heredity, 78: 107.
13. LI, B. and MCKEAND, S.E., 1989. Stability of Loblolly Pine families in the Southeastern U.S. Silvae Genetica, 38: 96-101.
14. LIN, C.S., BINNS, M.R. and LEFKOVITCH, L.P., 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Science, 26: 894-900.
15. LIPHSCHITZ, N., LEV-YADUN, S. and WAYSEL, Y., 1981. The annual rhythm of activity of the lateral meristems (cambium and phellogen) in Cupressus sempervirens L., Ann. Bot., 47: 485-496.
16. LUNDKVIST, K., 1984. Testing methods for general and specific adaptation in clonal forestry. Studia Forestalia Suecica, 166: 35-39.
17. MADAR, Z., SOLEL, Z. and KIMCHI, M., 1989. Effect of water stress in cypress on the development of cankers caused by Diplodia pinea f.sp. cupressi and Seiridium cardinale. Plant Dis., 73(6): 484-486.
18. MANION, P.D. and GRIFFIN, D.H., 1986. Sixty-five, years of research on Hypoxylon canker of aspen. Plant Dis., 70(8): 803-808.
19. MORIONDO, F., 1972. Il cancro del cipresso da Coryneum cardinale Wag.: la progressione del processo infettivo nei tessuti caulinari. Ann. Acc. It. Sci. For., 21: 399-426 (in Italian).
20. NASAR, R., LÉON, J. and HÜHN, M., 1994. Tests of significance for combined measures of plant stability and performance. Biom. J., 36(1): 109-123.
21. PANCONESI, A., 1990. Pathological disordes in the mediterranean basin. Report EUR 12493, pp. 54-81.
22. PANCONESI, A. and RADDI, P., 1990, Una realtà presente per il futuro del cipresso. Selezionati cloni resistenti al cancro. Cellulosa e Carta, 1: 29-31 (in Italian).
23. PANCONESI, A. and RADDI, P., 1991. Agrimed n. 1 e Bolgheri: due nuove selezioni resistenti al cancro del cipresso. Cellulosa e Carta, 1: 7 (in Italian).
24. PANCONESI, A., SANTINI, A. and CASINI, N., 1993. Conservazione della germinabilità e della patogenicita dei conidi di Seiridium cardinale (WAG.) SUTTON and GIBSON, in relazione alla sua diffusione epidemiologica. Inf. Fitopatol., 9: 45-49 (in Italian).
25. PANCONESI, A., CASINI, N., SANTINI, A. and STEFANINI F.M., 1995. Effect of Seiridium cardinale on growth of cypress (Cupressus sempervirens) clones. Can. J. For. Res., 25: 109-113.
26. PONCHET, J. and ANDREOLI, C., 1990. Compartmentalization and reactions in the host. Agrimed research programme. Progress in E.E.C. research on cypress diseases. Report EUR 12493 EN, pp. 96-111.
27. PONCHET, J., ANDREOLI, C., XENOPOULOS, S., CAETANO, M.F., RADDI, P. and PANCONESI, A., 1990. Pathogenic variability in Seiridium. Progress in E.E.C. research on cypress diseases. Report EUR 12493 EN, pp. 112-126.
28. RADDI, P. and PANCONESI, A., 1977. Miglioramento genetico del Cupressus sempervirens L. per la resistenza al Coryneum cardinale. Inf. Fitopatol., 1: 15-19 (in Italian).
29. RADDI, P. and PANCONESI, A., 1984. Pathogenicity of some isolates of Seiridium (Coryneum) cardinale, agent of cypress canker disease. Eur. J. For. Pathol., 14: 348-354.
30. RADDI, P. and PANCONESI, A., 1991. Genetic improvement of cypress for resistance to cypress canker: current state of research and prospects for the future. In: A. PANCONESI ed., Proposals of environmental and productive valorization in the Mediterranean countries of the European Community. C.N.R., Regione Toscana, C.E.E., N.B. 110-120.
31. RADDI, P., PANCONESI, A. and DI LONARDO, V., 1984, Miglioramento genetico del cipresso per la resistenza al cancro. Report EUR 9200, pp. 41-46 (in Italian).
32. RADDI, S., SANTINI, A. and CASINI, N., 1994. Comparison of enzymatic polymorphism in different Seiridium isolates In: Proceedings of 9th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union. Kusadasi, Aydin, Turkey. September 18-24 1994. Turkish Phytopathological Society Publications, 7: 281-285.
33. RASCH, D., 1971. Gemischte Klassifikationen der dreifachen Varianzanalyse. Biom. Z., 13: 1-20.
34. SANTINI, A., CASINI, N., PANCONESI, A. and DI LONARDO, V., 1994. Effetto dell'ambiente sulla morfologia e sulla crescita di alcuni cloni di Cupressus sempervirens e possibili relazioni con Seiridium cardinale. Monti e Boschi, 3: 42-48 (in Italian).
35. SCHEFFÉ, H., 1959. The analysis of variance. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.
36. SKRØPPA, T., 1984. A critical evaluation of methods available to estimate the genotype x environment interaction. Studia Forestalia Suecica, 166: 3-14.
37. SPARAPANO, L., LUISI N. and EVIDENTE, A., 1995. Comparison of pathogenic and toxigenic isolates of Seiridium cardinale from cankered cypresses. In: P. CAPRETTI, U. HEINIGER, R. STEPHAN eds., Shoot and foliage diseases in forest trees, pp. 32-127.
38. WRICKE, G., 1962. Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der ökologischen Streubreite in Feldversuchen. Z. Pflanzenzuecht, 47: 92-96.