Diverging attitudes of planners and the public: An examination of architectural interpretation

Journal of Architectural and Planning Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 317-328

  Hubbard, Philip ^a,b  

^a Faculty of Engineering and Computing   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ARCHITECTURAL EVALUATION;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

AESTHETICS; ARCHITECTURE; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDES;

EID: 0031393733     PISSN: 07380895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Canter D, Brown J, Groat LN (1985) The multiple sorting task. In J Brenner, J Brown, and D Canter (Eds.), The research interview. London: Academic Press.
2. Devlin K (1990) An examination of architectural interpretation: Architects versus non-architects. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 7(3):235-244.
3. Devlin K, Nasar JL (1989) The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of 'high' versus 'popular' residential architecture and public versus architect judgement of the same. Journal of Environmental Psychology 9:333-334.
4. Doise W, Clemence A, Lorenzi-Cioldi F (1993) The quantitative analysis of social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
5. Downing F (1992) The role of place and event imagery in the act of design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 9(1):64-80.
6. Groat LN (1982) Meaning in Post-modem architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2:3-22.
7. Groat LN (1994) Carbuncles, columns and pyramids: Lay and expert evaluations of contextual design strategies. In B Lightner and W Preiser (Eds.), Design review. New York: Chapman and Hall.
8. Hebder S (1992) Ethics in planning: The views of students and practitioners. Journal of Planning Education and Research 10:99-107.
9. Hershberger R (1969) A study of meaning in architecture. In H Sanoff and S Cohn (Eds.), EDRA proceedings. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
10. Hubbard PJ (1993) The value of conservation - A review of behavioural research. Town Planning Review 64:359-373.
11. Hubbard PJ (1994) Professional versus lay tastes in design control - An empirical investigation. Planning Practice and Research 9:271-287.
12. Knox P, Cullen J (1981) Planners as urban managers - The attitudes of senior British planners. Environment and Planning (A) 13:885-898.
13. Manser M (1980) An excuse for lousy buildings. Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects 87:49-50.
14. Pennartz PJJ (1989) Semiotic theory and environmental evaluation - A plea for a new approach. Symbolic Interaction 12:231-249.
15. Punter JV (1993) Developing design skills for development controllers. In R Haywood and S McGlynn (Eds.), Making better places - Urban design now. London: Butterworths.
16. Schiffman SS, Reynolds ML, Young FW (1985) Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theories, methods and applications. London: Academic Press.
17. Stamps AE, Miller SD (1993) Advocacy membership, design guidelines and predicting preferences for residential infill designs. Environment and Behavior 25:367-409.
18. Tannenbaum PH, McLeod JM (1967) On the measurement of specialisation. Public Opinion Quarterly 31:27-37.
19. Whitfield A, Wiltshire J (1982) Design training and aesthetic evaluation: An inter-group comparison. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2:101-107.