Genetic variation and the reintroduction of Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus to Sweetwater Marsh, California

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 236-244

  Helenurm, Kaius ^a,b   Parsons, Lorraine S ^c  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b W O Farber Center for Civic Leadership   (United States)

^c Sonoma County Water Agency   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORDYLANTHUS MARITIMUS; CORDYLANTHUS MARITIMUS MARITIMUS;

AQUATIC PLANT; ENDANGERED PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; REINTRODUCTION;

USA, CALIFORNIA;

EID: 0031392278     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.09728.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allendorf, F. W. 1986. Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biology 5:181-190.
2. Allendorf, F. W., and R. F. Leary. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in natural populations of animals. Pages 57-76 in M. E. Soule, editor. Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
3. Chakraborty, R. 1980. Gene diversity analysis in nested, subdivided populations. Genetics 96:721-726.
4. Chesser, R. K. 1991. Influence of gene flow and breeding tactics on gene diversity within populations. Genetics 129:573-583.
5. Constantine, C. C., R. P. Hobbs, and A. J. Lymbery. 1994. FORTRAN programs for analyzing population structure from multilocus genotypic data. Journal of Heredity 85:336-337.
6. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, New York, New York.
7. DeMauro, M. M. 1994. Development and implementation of a recovery program for the federal threatened Lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Pages 298-321 in M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whelan, editors. Restoration of endangered species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
8. Fink, B., and J. B. Zedler. 1991. Salt marsh bird's-beak seed broadcasting and habitat enhancement in San Diego County. California Department of Transportation. San Diego, California.
9. Haig, S. M., J. D. Ballou, and S. R. Derrickson. 1990. Management options for preserving genetic diversity: reintroduction of Guam Rails to the wild. Conservation Biology 4:290-300.
10. Heywood, J. S. 1986. The effect of plant size variation on genetic drift in populations of annuals. American Naturalist 127: 851-861.
11. Husband, B. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Estimating effective population size: a reply to Nunney. Evolution 49:392-394.
12. Jackson, L. L., N. Lopoukhine, and D. Hillyard. 1995. Ecological restoration: a definition and comments. Restoration Ecology 3:71-75.
13. Lesica, P., and F. W. Allendorf. 1992. Are small populations of plants worth preserving? Conservation Biology 6:135-139.
14. Lincoln, P. G. 1985. Pollinator effectiveness and ecology of seed set in Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus at Point Mugu, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Office, Sacramento, California.
15. Mitton, J. B., Y. B. Linhart, K. B. Sturgeon, and J. L. Hamrick. 1979. Allozyme polymorphism detected in mature needle tissue of ponderosa pine. Journal of Heredity 70:86-89.
16. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
17. Nunney, L., and K. A. Campbell. 1993. Assessing minimum viable population size: demography meets population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:234-239.
18. Nunney, L., and D. R. Elam. 1994. Estimating the effective population size of conserved populations. Conservation Biology 8:175-184.
19. Parsons, L. S., and J. B. Zedler. 1997. Factors affecting reestablishment of an endangered annual plant at a California salt marsh. Ecological Applications 7:253-267.
20. Pavlik, B. M., D. L. Nickrent, and A. M. Howald. 1993. The recovery of an endangered plant. I. Creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora. Conservation Biology 7:510-526.
21. Purer, E. 1942. Plant ecology of the coastal salt marshlands of San Diego County. Ecological Monographs 12:82-111.
22. Rogers, J. S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. Studies in Genetics VII. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas 7213:145-153.
23. Russell, W. C., E. T. Thorne, R. Oakleaf, and J. D. Ballou. 1994. The genetic basis of black-footed ferret reintroduction. Conservation Biology 8:263-266.
24. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. Freeman and Company, New York, New York.
25. Soltis, D. E., C. H. Haufler, D. C. Darrow, and G. J. Gastony. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73:9-27.
26. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1984. Recovery plan for salt marsh bird's-beak (Cordylanthus maritimus subsp. maritimus). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
27. Vanderwier, J. M., and J. C. Newman. 1984. Observations of haustoria and host preference in Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus at Mugu Lagoon. Madrono 31:185-186.
28. Wright, W. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. 2. The theory of gene frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.