Computational Aspects of Pathology Image Classification and Retrieval

Journal of Supercomputing

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 279-293

  Wetzel, Arthur W ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision tree; Feature selection; Genetic algorithm; Image classification; Image processing; Image retrieval; Instruction set; Signature file

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DECISION THEORY; FEATURE EXTRACTION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION THEORY; PARALLEL ALGORITHMS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SIMULATED ANNEALING; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

BAYESIAN PRINCIPLES; CONTENT BASED IMAGE MATCHING (CBIR); PATHOLOGY;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

EID: 0031381808     PISSN: 09208542     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007912009077     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bala, J., DeJong, K., Huang, J., Vafaie, H., and Wechsler, H. (1996). Using learning to facilitate the evolution of features for recognizing visual concepts, Evolutionary Computation, 4(3), 297-311.
2. Becich, M.J. (1997). personal communication.
3. Brill, F.Z., Brown, D.E., and Martin, W.N. (1990). Genetic Algorithms for Feature Selection for Counterpropagation Networks. Inst. for Parallel Computation, Univ. of Virginia, Tech. Rept. IPC-TR-90-004.
4. Chang, E.I., and Lippmann, R.P. (1991). Using genetic algorithms to improve pattern classification performance in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo CA.
5. Epstein, J.I. (1995). Prostate Biopsy Interpretation Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven
6. Faloutsos, C. (1987). Signature Files: An Integrated Access Method for Text and Attributes, Suitable for Optical Disk Storage. Univ of Maryland, Tech. Rept. UMIACS-TR-87-23.
7. Gleason, D.F., Mellinger, G.T. and the VA Cooperative Urologie Research Group, (1974). Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histologic Grading and Clinical Staging. J Urol 111, 58-64.
8. Goldberg, D.E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
9. Holland, J.H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, Univ. of Michigan Press.
10. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., and Vecchi, M.P. (1983), Optimization by Simulated Annealing, Science 220, 671-680.
11. Koza, J.R. (1992). Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection MIT Press.
12. Jurs, P.C., and Isenhour, T.L. (1975). Chemical Applications of Pattern Recognition. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
13. Larrhoven, P.J.M.V. (1987). Simulated Annealing. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.
14. Martinez, V.J., Jones, B.J.T., and Weygaert, R.V.D. (1990). Clustering Paradigms and Multifractal Measures. The Astrophysical Journal 357, 50-61.
15. Murthy, K.V.S. (1995). On Growing Better Decision Trees from Data Johns Hopkins University, PhD thesis.
16. Stoyan, D., Kendal, W.S., and Mecke, J. (1995). Stochastic Geometry and its Applications 2nd ed, John Wiley & Sons.
17. Wojno, K.J., Schwab, E.D., Consolino, C.M., and Oesterling, J.E. (1996). Fractal Analysis of the Gleason Grading System. Mod Pathol 9(1):175A.
18. Wojno, K., Brown, J., Consolino, C., Schwab, E., and Oesterling, J.E. (1997). Fractal Geometric Analysis as an Alternative to the Gleason Grading System for Prostate Cancer. The Journal of Urology 157(4):1151.
19. Ziman, J.M. (1979). Models of Disorder. Cambridge University Press.