Defining Johnson-Neyman regions of significance in the three-covariate ANCOVA using mathematica

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 361-387

  Hunka, Steve ^a   Leighton, Jacqueline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Johnson Neyman ANCOVA; Mathematica; Nonhomogeneous regression

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031371869     PISSN: 10769986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/10769986022004361     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abell, M. L., & Braselton, J. P. (1994). The Maples V handbook. Boston: Academic Press.
2. Borich, G. D., Godbout, R. C., & Wunderlich, K. W. (1976). The analysis of aptitude-treatment interaction: Computer programs and calculations. Chicago: International Educational Services.
3. Butsch, R. L. C. (1944). A worksheet for the Johnson-Neyman technique. Journal of Experimental Education, 12, 226-241.
4. Carroll, J. B., & Wilson, G. F. (1969). An interactive-computer program for the Johnson-Neyman technique in the case of two groups, two predictor variables, and one criterion variable (Research Bulletin RB69-68). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5. Carroll, J. B., & Wilson, G. F. (1970). An interactive-computer program for the Johnson-Neyman technique in the case of two groups, two predictor variables, and one criterion variable. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 121-132.
6. Ceurvorst, R. W. (1979). Computer program for the Johnson-Neyman technique. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 205-207.
7. Fisher, R. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver and Boyd.
8. Fisher, R. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver and Boyd.
9. Huitema, B. E. (1980). The analysis of covariance and alternatives. New York: Wiley.
10. Hunka, S. (1994). Using Mathematica to solve Johnson-Neyman problems. Mathematica in Education, 3(3), 32-36.
11. Hunka, S. (1995). Identifying regions of significance in ANCOVA problems having non-homogeneous regressions. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 161-188.
12. Johnson, P. O., & Fay, L. C. (1950). The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika, 15, 349-367.
13. Johnson, P. O., & Hoyt, C. (1947). On determining three dimensional regions of significance. Journal of Experimental Education, 15, 342-353.
14. Johnson, P. O., & Jackson, R. W. B. (1959). Modern statistical methods: Descriptive and inductive. Chicago: Rand McNally.
15. Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57-93.
16. Karpman, M. B. (1980). ANCOVA - A one covariate Johnson-Neyman algorithm. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 791-793.
17. Karpman, M. B. (1983). The Johnson-Neyman technique using SPSS or BMDP. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 137-147.
18. Karpman, M. B. (1986). Comparing two non-parallel regression lines with the parametric alternative to analysis of covariance using SPSS-X or SAS - The Johnson-Neyman technique. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 639-644.
19. Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20. Koenker, R. H., & Hansen, C. W. (1942). Steps for the application of the Johnson-Neyman technique - A sample analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 10, 164-173.
21. Kush, J. C. (1986). A Fortran V IBM computer program for the Johnson-Neyman technique. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 185-187.
22. Lautenschlager, G. J. (1987). JOHN-NEY: An interactive program for computing the Johnson-Neyman confidence region for nonsignificant prediction differences. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 194-195.
23. Leighton, J. (1995). Circumventing ANCOVA's assumptions using Mathematica. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
24. Llabre, M. M., & Ware, W. B. (1980). Equal cell size and nonorthogonality in ANCOVA. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 91-94.
25. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
26. Maxwell, S. E., O'Callaghan, M. F., & Delaney, H. D. (1993). Analysis of covariance. In L. K. Edwards (Ed.), Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science (pp. 63-104). New York: Marcel Dekker.
27. Mood, A. M. (1950). Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
29. Rogosa, D. (1981). On the relationship between the Johnson-Neyman region of significance and statistical tests of parallel within-group regressions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 73-84.
30. Rutherford, A. (1992). Alternatives to traditional analysis of covariance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 197-223.
31. Schafer, W. D., & Wang, Y. (1991, April). Graphical description of Johnson-Neyman outcomes for linear and quadratic regression surfaces. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
32. Searle, S. R. (1971). Linear models. New York: Wiley.
33. Searle, S. R. (1987). Linear models for unbalanced data. New York: Wiley.
34. Searle, S. R., Speed, F. M., & Henderson, H. V. (1981). Some computational and model equivalences in analysis of variance of unequal-subclass-numbers data. The American Statistician, 35(1), 16-33.
35. Walker, H. M., & Lev, J. (1953). Statistical inference. New York: Henry Holt.
36. Wolfram, S. (1991). Mathematica, a system for doing mathematics by computer. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.