A comprehensive methodology for evaluating the commercial potential of technologies: The strategic technology evaluation method

International Journal of Industrial Engineering : Theory Applications and Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 220-235

  Chifos, Carla ^a   Jain, R K ^a  

^a University of Cincinnati   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; MARKETING; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL; STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION METHOD; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTIONS;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 0031360404     PISSN: 10724761     EISSN: 1943670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Adoutte, R. (1989). High Technology As a Commercial Asset. International Journal of Technology Management. 4, 4/5: 397-406.
2. Alic, J., Branscomb, L., Brooks, H., Carter, A., and Epstein, G. (1992). Beyond Spinoff: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
3. Badawy, M. (1991). Technology and Strategic Advantage: Managing Corporate Technology Transfer in the USA and Japan. International Journal of Technology Management. Special Publication on the Role of Technology in Corporate Policy.: 205-215.
4. Bell, E. (1993). Some current issues in Technology Transfer and Academic-Industrial Relations: A Review. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 5, 3: 307-321.
5. Bosomworth, C. (1995). How 26 companies manage their central research. Research Technology Management. 38, 3: 32-40.
6. Bozeman, B. (1991) Evaluating technology transfer success: A national survey of government laboratories. In 16th Annual Meeting Proceedings of Technology Transfer Society (Eds: R. Chapman and W. Sharp). Technology Transfer Society, Denver, pp. 138-153.
7. Bozeman, B. and Coker, K. (1992). Assessing the effectiveness of Technology Transfer from US Government R&D Laboratories: The Impact of Market Orientation. Technovation. 12, 4: 239-255.
8. Branscomb, L. (1993). Targeting Critical Technologies. In Empowering Technology: Implementing a US Strategy (ed) L. Branscomb. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp.36-63.
9. Branscomb, L., Florida, R., Hart, D., Keller, J., and Boville, D. (1997). Investing in Innovation: Toward a Consensus Strategy for Federal Technology Policy. Sponsored by the Competitiveness Policy Council. Science, Technology and Public Policy Program Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
10. Brown, M., Berry, L., and Goel, R. (1991). Guidelines for successfully transferring government-sponsored innovations. Research Policy. 20: 121-143.
11. Carr, R. (1994). Doing Technology Transfer in Federal Laboratories. In From Lab to Market: Commercialization of Public Sector Technology (Ed.) S. Kassicieh and H. Radosevich, Plenum Press, New York, pp.61-87.
12. Clinton, W. and Gore, A., Jr. (1993). Technology for America's Economic Growth: A New Direction to Build Economic Strength. Statement on February 22. The White House, Washington, DC.
13. Davey, J. (1991). Economic Development as Critical Links Between Existing Industries and Federal Laboratories. Economic Development Review, Winter: 41-46.
14. Department of Energy/National Institute of Standards and Technology (DOE/NIST) (1995). Energy-Related Inventions Program: Brief Status Report. Vol I and II. Washington, DC.
15. EPA (1995). Radio Frequency Heating. KAI Technologies. Inc.: Innovative Technology Evaluation Report. EPA/540/R-94/528. April.
16. Jain, R. and Chifos, C. (1997). Facilitating the Commercialization of Public Technology: Adopting the University as a Partner. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4, 4: 212-219.
17. Jain, R. and Triandis H. (1997) Management of Research and Development Organizations: Managing the Unmanageable. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.
18. Kash, D. and Rycroft, R. (1995) U.S. Federal Government R&D and Commercialization: You can't get there from here. R&D Management, 25, 1: 71-89.
19. Lhuillery, S. (1996) Innovation in French Manufacturing Industry: A Review of the Findings of the Community Innovation Survey. In Innovation, Patents and Technological Strategies, OECD, Paris: 89-124.
20. Lobenstein, K. (1990). Future of University Industry Licensing. Les Nouvelles, September: 138-147.
21. Lyons, P. (1995). Testimony to Joint Hearing on Technology Transfer. Submitted to US House of Representative, Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Basic Research, and Subcommittee on Technology, Washington, DC, June 27.
22. Martin, M. (1984) Managing Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Reston Publishing Company, Reston, VA.
23. Mingesz, D. (1996). Written correspondence, Oct, 22. He is Director, Industrial Technology Development Center, Argonne National Laboratory.
24. Morone, J. and Ivins, R. (1982) Problems and Opportunities in Technology Transfer from the National Laboratories to Industry. Research Management, 25, 3: 35-44.
25. Rahm, D., Bozeman , B., and Crow, M. (1988). Domestic Technology Transfer and Competitiveness: An Empirical Assessment of Roles of University and Governmental R&D Laboratories. Public Administration Review, Nov/Dec: 969- 978.
26. Reddy, N. (1988). Market Opportunity Analysis for Emerging Technologies. Management Decision, 23, 8: 10-19.
27. Roberson, B. and Weijo, R. (1988) Using Market Research to Convert Federal Technology to Marketable Products. Technology Transfer, Fall: 27-33.
28. Ryans, J. Jr., Shanklin, W. (1988). Four Essentials for Effective High Technology Marketing. In Federal Lab Technology Transfer: Issues and Policies (ed) G. Bopp, Praeger, New York: 89-124.
29. Skelton, T. and Thamhain, H. (1993). Concurrent Project Management: A Tool for Technology Transfer, R&D-to-Market. Project Management Journal, 24, 4: 41-48.
30. Smilor, R., Gibson, D., Avery C. (1989). Research and Development Consortia and Technology Transfer: Initial Lessons from MCC. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 14: 11-22.
31. Spann, M., Adams, M., Souder, W. (1995) Measures of Technology Transfer Effectiveness: Key Dimension in their use by Sponsors, Developers, and Adopters. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 1: 19-29.
32. Stacey, G. and Ashton, W. (1990). A structured approach to corporate technology strategy. International Journal of Technology Management, 5, 4: 389-407.
33. Thamhain, H. (1994). Concurrent Engineering: Criteria for Effective Implementation. IM, Nov/Dec: 29-32.
34. Zahra, S., Sisodia, R., and Das, S. (1994). Technological choices within competitive strategy types: a conceptual integration. International Journal of Technology Management, 9, 2: 172-195.