An accuracy model for the peripheral milling of aluminum alloys using response surface design

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 42-47

  Fuh, Kuang Hua ^a   Chang, Hung Yen ^a  

^a TATUNG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Peripheral milling; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; HARDNESS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BRINELL HARDNESS; PERIPHERAL MILLING; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

METAL CUTTING;

EID: 0031358040     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00127-1     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Y. Fujii, H. Iwabe, M. Suzuki, Effect of dynamic behaviour of end mill in machining on work accuracy, Bull. Japan Soc. Prec. Eng. 13 (1979) 20-26.
2. W.A. Kline, R.E. DeVor, J.R. Lindberg, The prediction of cutting forces in end milling with application to cornering cuts, Int. J. Mach Tool Des. Res. 22 (1) (1982) 7-22.
3. W.A. Kline, R.E. DeVor, I.A. Shareef, The prediction of surface accuracy in end milling, Trans. ASME J. Eng. Ind. 104 (1982) 272-278.
4. T. Matsubara, H. Yamamoto, H. Mizumoto, Study on accuracy in end mill operations, Bull. Japan Soc. Prec. Eng. 21 (2) (1987) 95-100.
5. E. Budak, Y. Altintas, Peripheral milling conditions for improved dimensional accuracy, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 34 (7) (1994) 907-918.
6. D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, New York, 1984, pp. 446-463.
7. Metals Handbook Ninth Edition Volume 16 Machining, ASM Int., 1989, p. 643.
8. K.G. Budinski, Engineering Materials Properties and Selection, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992, p. 588.
9. M. Kronenberg, Machining Science and Application, Pergamon, London, 1966, p. 265-268.