Empirical research on social work supervision: The state of the art (1970-1995)

Journal of Social Service Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 39-54

  Tsui, Ming Sum ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031350450     PISSN: 01488376     EISSN: 15407314     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J079v23n02_03     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Austin, M. J., 1981. Supervisory Management for the Human Services, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
2. Barretta-Herman, A., 1993. On the development of a model of supervision for licensed social work practitioners. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(2):55–64.
3. Bernard, J. M., and Goodyear, R. K., 1992. Fundamentals of Clinical Supervision, Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
4. Brashears, R., 1995. Supervision as social work practice:A reconceptualization. Social Work, 40(5):692–699.
5. Bunker, D. R., and Wijnberg, M. H., 1988. Supervision and Performance:Managing Professional Work in Human Service Organizations, San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Boss.
6. Chemesky, R. H., 1986. “A new model of supervision”. In Feminist Visions for Social Work, Edited by:Van Den Bergh, N., and Cooper, L. B., 128–148. Silver Spring, MD:National Association of Social Workers.
7. Dendinger, D. C., and Kohn, E., 1989. Assessing supervisory skills. The Clinical Supervisor*, 7(1):41–55.
8. Eisikovits, Z., Meier, R., Guttman, E., Shurka, E., and Levinstein, A., 1985. Supervision in ecological context:The relationship between the quality of supervision and the work and treatment environment. Journal of Social ServiceResearch, 8(4):37–58.
9. Erera, P., and Lazar, A., 1993. Training needs of social work supervisors. TheClinical Supervisor,:83–93.
10. Erera, I. P., and Lazar, A., 1994a. The administrative and educational functions in supervision:Indications of incompatibility. The Clinical Supervisor, 2(2):39–56.
11. Erera, I. P., and Lazar, A., 1994b. Operating Kadushin’s model of social work supervision. Journal of Social Service Research, 75(3/4):109–122.
12. Granvold, D. K., 1977. Supervisory style and educational preparation of public welfare supervisors. Administration in Social Work, I:79–88.
13. Granvold, D. K., 1978. Training social work supervisors to meet organizational and worker objectives. Journal of Education for Social Work*, 14:38–45.
14. Gray, S. W., 1990. The interplay of social work licensure and supervision:An exploratory study. The Clinical Supervisor, 5(1):53–65.
15. Greenspan, R., Hanfling, S., Parker, E., Prtmm, S., and Waldfogel, D., 1992. Supervision of experienced agency workers:A descriptive study. The Clinical Supervisor, 9(2):31–42.
16. Harkness, D., 1995. The art of helping in supervised practice:Skills, relationships, and outcomes. The Clinical Supervisor, J(1):63–76.
17. Harkness, D., and Poertner, J., 1989. Research and social work supervision:A conceptual review. Social Work, 34(2):115–118.
18. Harkness, D., and Hensley, H., 1991. Changing the focus of social work supervision:Effects on client satisfaction and generalized contentment. Social Worky, 37:506–512.
19. Hawkins, P., and Shohet, R., 1990. Supervision in the Helping Professions, London:Open University Press.
20. Himlc, D. P., Jayaratne, S., and Thyness, P. A., 1989. The buffering effects of four types of supervisory support on work stress. Administration in Social Work, J(1):19–34.
21. Holloway, S., and Brager, G., 1989. Supervising in the Human Service:The Politics of Practice, New York:The Free Press.
22. Holloway, E., 1995. Clinical Supervision:A System Approach, London:SAGE.
23. Kadushin, A., 1974. Supervisor-supervisee:A survey. Social Work, 19:288–298.
24. Kadushin, A., 1992a. Supervision in Social Work. (), 3rd ed, New York:Columbia University Press.
25. Kadushin, A., 1992b. What’s wrong, what’s right with social work supervision?. The Clinical Supervisor, 10(1):3–19.
26. Kadushin, A., 1992c. Social work supervision:An updated survey. The Clinical Supervisor, 10(2):9–27.
27. Kaslow, F. W., 1977. Supervision, Consultation, and Staff Training in the Helping Professions, San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
28. Ko, G. P., 1987. Casework supervision in voluntary family service agencies in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 30:171–184.
29. Latting, J. E., 1986. Adaptive supervision:A theoretical model for social workers. Administration in Social Work, 10:15–23.
30. Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., and Delworth, U., 1982. Supervision:A conceptual model. The Counseling Psychologist,:3–42.
31. Lowy, L., 1983. Social work supervision:From models toward theory. Journal of Education for Social Work, 19(2):55–62.
32. McKitrick, D. S., and Garrison, M. A., 1992. Theory of supervision outline:A training tool. The Clinical Supervisor, 19(2):173–183.
33. Melichercik, J., 1984. Social work supervision in transition:An exploration of current supervisory practice. The Social Worker, 52(2):108–112.
34. Middleman, R. R., and Rhodes, G. B., 1985. Competent Supervision:Making Imaginative Judgements, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
35. Miller, I., 1987. “Supervision in social work.”. In Encyclopedia of Social Work, Vol. 2, 748–756. Silver Spring, MD:National Association of Social Workers Press. (18th cd.)
36. Munson, C. E., 1975. The Uses of Structural, Authority and Teaching Methods inSocial Work Supervision, University of Maryland. DSW Dissertation
37. Munson, C. E., 1979a. Evaluation of male and female supervisors. Social Work, 24:104–1.
38. Munson, C. E., 1979b. Social Work Supervision:Classic Statements andCritical Issues, New York:The Free Press.
39. Munson, C. E., 1981. Style and structure in supervision. Journal of Education for Social Work, 17(1):65–72.
40. Munson, C. E., 1993. Clinical Social Work Supervision. (), 2nd ed., New York:The Haworth Press, Inc.
41. Newsome, M., and Pillari, V., 1991. Job satisfaction and the worker-supervisor relationship. The Clinical Supervisor, 9(2):119–129.
42. Pilcher, A. J., 1984. The state of social work supervision in Victoria according to the practitioners. Australian Social Work, 37(3/4):33–43.
43. Poertner, J., and Rapp, C., 1983. What is social work supervision?. The ClinicalSupervisor, I:53–65.
44. Raukti’s, M. E., and Koeske, G. F., 1994. Maintaining social worker morale:When supportive supervision is not enough. Administration in Social Work, I8(1):39–60.
45. Rich, P., 1993. The form, function, and content of clinical supervision:An integrated model. The Clinical Supervisor,:137–178.
46. Russell, P. A., Lankford, M. W., and Grinnell, R. M., 1983. Attitudes to wardsupervisors in a human service agency. The Clinical Supervisor,:57–71.
47. Scott, W. R., 1965. Reactions to supervision in a heteronomous professional organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10:65–8.
48. Scott, D., and Farrow, J., 1993. Evaluating standards of social work supervision in child welfare and hospital social work. Australian Social Work, 46(2):33–41.
49. Shulman, L., Robinson, E., and Luckj, A., 1981. A Study of the Content. Contextand Skills of Supervision, Vancouver:University of British Columbia.
50. Shulman, L., 1993. Interactional Supervision, Washington, DC:National Association of Social Workers.
51. Vinokur-Kaplan, D., 1987. A national survey of in-service training experiences of child welfare supervisors and workers. Social Service Review, 37:291–304.
52. Western New York Chapter, NASW Committee on Social Work. 1958. A chapter survey. Social Work, 3:18–25.
53. York, R. O., and Hastings, T., 1985. Worker maturity and supervisory leadership behavior. Administration in Social Work, 9(4):37–46.
54. York, R. O., and Denton, R. T., 1990. Leadership behavior and supervisory performance:The view from below. The Clinical Supervisor, S(1):93–108.