Gait comparison of two prosthetic knee units

Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 168-173

  Sutherland, Jeffrey L ^a   Sutherland, David H ^b,c   Kaufman, Kenton R ^d   Teel, Michael ^a  

^a Vogue Prosthet Orthotic Ctr/R   (United States)

^b RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c University of California ^*  (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Force Plate; Gait; Kinematics; Kinetics; Knee

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031330918     PISSN: 10408800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008526-199700940-00008     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Saunders JB, Inman V, Eberhardt H.The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. JBJS 1953;35:A:543-58.
2. Sutherland DH, Kaufman KR, Moitoza JR. Kinematics of normal human walking. In: Rose J, Bamble JG (eds). Human walking, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1984:24.
3. Sutherland DH. Gait disorders in childhood and adolescence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1984:24.
4. Sutherland DH, Olshen RA, Biden EN, Wyatt MP. The development of mature walking. Philadelphia: MacKeith Press, 1988:65-153.
5. Paul JP. The effect of walking speed on the force actions transmitted at the hip and knee joints. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, February 1970;63:2.
6. de Vries J. Conventional 4-bar linkage knee mechanisms: a strength/weakness analysis. J Rehab Res Devel 1955;32:1:36-42.
7. Radcliffe CW. Prosthetics. In: Rose J, Gamble JG (eds). Human walking, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994:165-99.
8. Skinner SR, Antonelli D, Perry J, Lester DK. Functional demands on the stance limb in walking. Orthopedics 1985;8:355-6.