Refining sex-role spillover theory: The role of gender subtypes and harasser attributions

Social Cognition

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 291-311

  Burgess, Diana ^a   Borgida, Eugene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031329128     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.1997.15.4.291     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baker, D. D., Terpstra, E. E., & Larntz, K. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 22, 305-326.
2. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181-198.
3. Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.
4. Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C. D., & Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 272-281.
5. Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1997a). Sexual harassment: An experimental test of sex-role spillover theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 63-75.
6. Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1997b). Sex-role spillover theory: Scientific and legal issues. Manuscript in preparation. University of Minnesota.
7. Carothers, C. C., & Crull, P. (1984). Contrasting sexual harassment in female- and male-dominated occupations. In K. B. Sacks & D. Remy (Eds.), My troubles are going to have trouble with me (pp. 219-228). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8. Deaux, K. (1995). How basic can you be? The evolution of research on gender stereotypes. Journal of Social Issues 51, 11-20.
9. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991-1004.
10. Eagly, A. H., & Kite, M. E (1987). Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991-1004.
11. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone, (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 5 (pp. 1-35). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
12. Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203-216.
13. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
14. Fair Employee Practices Guidelines. Waterford, CT: Bureau of Business Practice, 1978-1982.
15. Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (1995). Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organizational change. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 97-116.
16. Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049-1060.
17. Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace. American Psychologist, 48, 1070-1076.
18. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (1989). The dimensions of sexual harassment: A structural analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35, 309-326.
19. Frazier, P. A., Cochran, C. C., & Olson, A. M. (1995). Social science research on lay definitions of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 21-38.
20. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
21. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
22. Grimsley, K. D., Swoboda, F., & Brown, W. (4/29/96). "Fear on the line at Mitsubishi." The Washington Post, pp. A1, A8-A9.
23. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
24. Gutek, B. A., & O'Connor, M. O. (1995). The empirical basis for the reasonable woman standard. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 151-166.
25. Inman, M. L., & Baron, R. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 727-739.
26. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co, 824 F. Supp. 847 (D. Minn 1993).
27. Jost, J. T, & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27
28. Pryor, J. D. (1985). The lay person's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 13(5/6), 273-278.
29. Pryor, J. D., & Whalen, N. (1997). A typology of sexual harassment: Characteristics of harassers and the social circumstances under which sexual harassment occurs. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research and treatment (pp. 129-151). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Sackett, P. R., DuBois, C. L. Z., & Noe, A. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 263-267.
32. Sheffey, S., & Tindale, R. S. (1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1502-1520.
33. Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 57-71.
34. Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. (1997). In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.