Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of curved root canals

Endodontics and Dental Traumatology

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 265-268

  Goldberg, F ^a,b   Araujo, J A ^a  

^a Evidence based Dentistry Commission   (Argentina)

^b NONE   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Endodontic instruments; Root canal instrumentation; Root canal transportation

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZATION; STANDARD; TOOTH PULP;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; NICKEL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM;

EID: 0031324436     PISSN: 01092502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00053.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974; 18:269-96.
2. Weine FS. Endodontic therapy. 3rd. ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1982. p. 256-340.
3. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and apical foramen shape. J Endod 1975;l:255-62.
4. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Click DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;101:792-4.
5. Briscno BM, Sonnabend E. The influence of different root canal instruments on root canal preparation: an in vitro study. Int EndodJ 1991;24:15-23.
6. Roig-Cayön M, Brau-Aguadé E, Canalda-Sahli C, Moreno-Aguado V. A comparison of molar root canal preparations using Flexofîle, Canal Master U, and Heliapical instruments. J Endod 1994;20:495-9.
7. Wlldey WL, Senia ES, Montgomery S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:499-507.
8. Lim KG, Webber J. The effect of root canal preparation on the shape of the curved root canal. Int Endod J 1985;18:2339.
9. Hülsmann M, Stryga F. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation. J Endod 1993; 19:141-5.
10. ElDecb ME, Boraas JC. The effect of files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals. Int Endod J 1985; 18:1-7.
11. Kielt LW, Montgomery S. The effect of Endosonic instrumentation in simulated curved root canals. J Endod 1987; 13:2159.
12. Luiten DJ, Morgan LA, BaumgartnerJC, Marshall JG. A comparison of four instrumentation techniques on apical canal transportation. J Endod 1995;21:26-32.
13. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of curved root canals using the modified double-flared technique. J Endod 1994;20:440-4.
14. Pedicord D, ElDeeb ME, Messer HH. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: its effect on canal shape and instrumentation time. J Endod 1986;12:375-81.
15. Lim SS, Stock CJR. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J 1987;20:33-9.