Medical image databases for CAD applications in digital mammography: Design issues

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 43, Issue , 1997, Pages 601-605

  Kallergi, Maria ^a   Clark, Robert A ^a   Clarke, Laurence P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; IMAGE RESOLUTION;

CAD APPLICATIONS; CLINICAL VALUE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; IMAGE DATABASE; IMAGE SELECTION; MEDICAL IMAGE DATABASE; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DATA BASE; EXPERT SYSTEM; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EXPERT SYSTEMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031324345     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-887-8-601     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Kroon HM, Steyerberg EW, Kool LJS, Hilkens CMU, and Seeley GW. Considerations in compiling a database of clinical test images. Invest. Radiol. 1992; 27:255-263.
2. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data in radiological ROC studies. Invest. Radiol. 1989; 24:234-245.
3. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE, Yin FF, Vyborny CJ, and Schmidt RA. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med. Phys. 1994; 21(2):265-269.
4. USF and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center mammography database-Questions can be addressed to Dr. Maria Kallergi (e-mail: kallergi@a rad.usf.edu).
5. Panel Discussion: Design of a common database for research in mammogram image analysis. SPIE 1993; 1905:534-553.
6. Suckling J, Parke J, Dance DR, et al. The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database. In Digital Mammography, Proc. 2nd Intern. Workshop on Digital Mammography, York, England, 10-12 July 1994. Gale AG, et al, Editors. Elsevier Science, B.V., pp. 375-378, 1994.
7. Nijmegen mammography database-Questions can be addressed to Dr. Nico Karssemeijer (e-mail: nico@mbfys.kun.nl).
8. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL) and University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) mammography database-Questions can be addressed to e-mail: mammo-db-hel@llnl.gov.
9. USF Computer Science & Engineering Department mammography database-Questions can be addressed to e-mail: ddsm@bigpine.csee.usf.edu
10. Zink S and Jaffe CC. Medical Imaging Databases: An NIH Workshop. Invest. Radiol. 1993; 28(4):366-372.
11. Kallergi M, Clarke LP, Qian W, et al. Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized, and waveletenhanced, monitor displayed mammograms: An ROC study. Academic Radiology 1996; 3:285-293.
12. Chan HP, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL, and Adler DD. Digitization requirements in mammography: Effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med. Phys. 1994; 21(7):1203-1211.
13. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Petrick N, Lam KL, and Helvie MA. Effects of pixel size on classification of microcalcifications on digitized mammograms. SPIE 1996; 2710:30-41.
14. Feig SA. Decreased breast cancer mortality through mammographic screening: results of clinical trials. Radiology 1988; 167:659-665.
15. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Wei D, et al. Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: Application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue. Med. Phys. 1996; 23(10):1671-1684.
16. Wei D, Chan HP, Helvie MA, et al. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: Multi-resolution texture analysis. Med. Phys. 1995; 22:1501-1513.
17. Reintgen D, Berman C, Cox C, Baekey P, Nicosia S, Greenberg H, Bush C, Lyman GH, and Clark RA. The anatomy of missed breast cancers. Surgical Oncology 1993; 2:65-75.
18. Murata N, Yoshizawa S, and Amari S. Network Information Criterion-Determining the number of hidden units for an artificial neural network model. WEE Trans. Neural Networks 1994; 5(6):865-872.
19. Wagner RF, Chan HP, Mossoba J, et al. Finite sample effects and resampling plans: Applications to linear classifiers in computer-aided diagnosis. Proc. Medical Imaging 1997, Feb. 22-28, Newport Beach, CA.
20. Nab HW, Karssemeijer N, Van erring L, Hendriks J. Comparision of digital and conventional and digital mammography, a ROC study of 270 mammograms. Med. Inform. 1992; 17(2):125-131.
21. Qian W, Kallergi M, Clarke LP, Li HD, Venugopal P, Song D, and Clark RA. Tree structured wavelet transform segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammography. Med. Phys. 1995; 22(8):1247-1254.
22. Li H-D, Kallergi M, Clarke LP, Jain VK, and Clark RA. Markov Random Field for Tumor Detection in Digital Mammography. JER.E Trans Med Imag 1995; 14(3):565-576.
23. Lefebvre F, Benali H, Gilles R, Kahn E, and Di Paola R. A fractal approach to the segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med. Phys. 1995; 22(4):381-390.
24. Zhang W, Doi K, Giger ML, et al. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med. Phys. 1996; 23(4):595-601.
25. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Bick U, Lu P, Wolverton DE, and Schmidt RA. Analysis of spiculation in the comuterized classification of mammographic masses. Med. Phys. 1995; 22(10):1569-1579.
26. Takehiro E, Doi K, Nishikawa R, et al. Image feature analysis and CAD in mammography: Reduction of false-positive clustered microcalcifications using local edge-gradient analysis. Med. Phys. 1995; 22(2):161.
27. Yin FF, Giger ML, Doi K, et al. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: Automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral subtraction technique. Med. Phys. 1994;21(3):445.
28. Elkadiki SG and Rangayyan RM. Objective characterisation of image accutance. SPIE 1994; 2166:210.
29. Windfield D, Silbiger M, Brown GS, et al. Technology transfer in digital mammography: Report of the Joint NCI-NASA Workshop of May 19-20, 1993. Invest. Radiol. 1994; 29(4):507-515.