State legislators' perceptions of lobbyists and lobbying on tobacco control issues

Tobacco Control

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 332-336

  Cohen, Joanna E ^a,e   Goldstein, Adam O ^b   Flynn, Brian S ^c   Munger, Michael C ^c   Gottlieb, Nell H ^d   Solomon, Laura J ^d   Dana, Greg S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^e ONTARIO TOBACCO RESEARCH UNIT   (Canada)

Author keywords

Legislators; Lobbying; Tobacco control

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DRUG LEGISLATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PLANT; POLITICS; SMOKING; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; LEGISLATION, DRUG; LOBBYING; NORTH CAROLINA; PLANTS, TOXIC; POLICY MAKING; SMOKING; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TEXAS; TOBACCO; VERMONT;

EID: 0031317967     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.6.4.332     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among young people. A report of the Surgeon General, 1994. Atlanta, Georgia: Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health, 1994 (US Government Printing Office No S/N 017-001-00491-0.)
2. Novotny TE, Romano RA, Davis RM, Mills SL. The public health practice of tobacco control: lessons learned and directions for the states in the 1990s. Ann Rev Public Health 1992;13:287-318.
3. Davis R. Tobacco policy research comes of age. Tobacco Control 1995;4:6-9.
4. Songer DR, Underwood JM, Dillon SG, Jameson PE, Kite DW. Voting cues in two state legislatures: a further application of the Kingdon model. Soc Sci Q 1985;66:983-90.
5. Stratmann T. What do campaign contributions buy? Deciphering causal effects of money and votes. Southern Econ J 1991;57:606-20.
6. Jones Jr. W, Keiser KR. US senate voting on health and safety regulation: the effects of ideology and interest-group orientations. Health Policy 1986;6:33-14.
7. Wright JR. PACs, contributions and roll calls: an organizational perspective. Am Polit Sci Rev 1985;79:400-14.
8. Wright JR. Contributions, lobbying, and committee voting in the US House of Representatives. Am Polit Sci Rev 1990;84:417-38.
9. Samuels B, Glantz SA. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA 1991;266:2110-7.
10. Jacobson PD, Wasserman J, Raube K. The politics of antismoking legislation. J Health Polit Policy Law 1993;18:787-819.
11. Glantz SA, Begay ME. Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California. JAMA 1994;272:1175-82.
12. Moore S, Wolfe SM, Lindes D, Douglas CE. Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation. JAMA 1994;272:1171-5.
13. Goldstein AO, Cohen JE, Flynn BS, et al. State legislators' attitudes and voting intentions about tobacco control legislation. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1197-200.
14. Stata Corporation. Stata reference manual: release 5. Vol. 1. College Station, Texas: Stata Corporation, 1997.
15. Goldstein AO, Bearman NS. Epidemiology of state tobacco lobbyists and organizations in the United States. Am J Public Health 1996;86:1137-42.
16. Carney JK, Hamrell MC, Wargo WE. No butts about it: public smoking ends in Vermont. Am J Public Health 1997;87:860-1.
17. Todd JS, Rennie D, McAfee RE, et al. The Brown and Williamson documents. Where do we go from here? JAMA 1995;274:256-8.