Sentencing policy and the abolition of parole and early release

International Journal of the Sociology of Law

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 337-361

  Henham, Ralph ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031316884     PISSN: 01946595     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijsl.1997.0047     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ashworth, A. (1982) Judicial independence and sentencing reform. In The Future of Sentencing, Occasional Paper No. 8. Institute of Criminology: Cambridge.
2. Ashworth, A. (1990) Sentencing and the constitution. Kings College Law Journal 1, 29-40.
3. Ashworth, A. (1995) Sentencing and Criminal Justice. Butterworths: London.
4. Ashworth, A. (1996) Editorial. Criminal Law Review 43, 365-369.
5. Ashworth, A. & Hough, M. (1996) Sentencing and the climate of opinion. Criminal Law Review 43, 776-787.
6. Austin, J. (1996) The effect of "Three Strikes and You're Out" on corrections. In Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy (Shichor, D. & Sechrest, D.K., Eds). Sage: Thouand Oaks, California.
7. Beddard, R. (1993) Human Rights and Europe. Grotius: Oxford.
8. Bernstein, F.A. (1995) Discretion redux - mandatory minimums, federal judges, and the "Safety-Valve" provision of the 1994 Crime Act. University of Daytona Law Review 20, 765-778.
9. Blalock, I. (1982) Parole guidelines. In Sentencing Reform: Experiments in Reducing Disparity (Forst, M.L., Ed.). Sage: Beverly Hills, California.
10. Bottoms, A. (1995) The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In The Politics of Sentencing Reform (Clarkson, C. & Morgan, R., Eds). Clarendon Press: Oxford.
11. Cavadino, M. & Dignan, J. (1992) The Penal System: An Introduction. Sage: London.
12. Freiberg, A. (1992) Truth in Sentencing? The abolition of remissions in Victoria: Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic.). Criminal Law Journal 16, 165-185.
13. Freiberg, A. (1995) Sentencing reform in Victoria: a case study. In The Politics of Sentencing Reform (Clarkson, C. & Morgan, R., Eds). Clarendon Press: Oxford.
14. Harding, C. & Koffman, L. (1995) Sentencing and the Penal System: Text and Materials. Sweet and Maxwell: London.
15. Henham, R. (1992) Evaluating the United States ederal sentencing guidelines. Anglo-American Law Review 21, 399-414.
16. Henham, R. (1995) Sentencing policy and the role of the Court of Appeal. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 34, 218-227.
17. Henham, R. (1996a) Criminal Justice and Sentencing Policy. Dartmouth: Aldershot.
18. Henham, R. (1996b) Back to the future on sentencing: the 1996 white paper. Modern Law Review 59, 861-875.
19. Home Office (1990) Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public: The Government's Proposals for Legislation. HMSO: London. Cm. 965.
20. Home Office (1994) Statistics of Drug Seizures and Offenders dealt with United Kingdom 1993. Government Statistical Service: London. Statistical Bulletin 28/ 94.
21. Home Office (1995) Cautions, Court Proceedings and Sentencing, England and Wales, 1994. Government Statistical Service: London. Statistical Bulletin 18/ 95.
22. Home Office (1996) Protecting the Public: The Government's Strategy on Crime in England and Wales. HMSO: London. Cm. 3190.
23. Hood, R. (1992) Race and Sentencing: A study in the Crown Court. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
24. Hood, R. & Shute, S. (1996a) Parole criteria, parole decisions and the prison population: evaluating the impact of the Criminal Justice Act 1991. Criminal Law Review 43, 77-87.
25. Hood, R. & Shute, S. (1996b) Protecting the public: automatic life sentences, parole and high risk offenders. Criminal Law Review 43, 788-800.
26. Hough, M. (1996) People talking about punishment. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 35, 191-214.
27. Hutton, N. (1995) Sentencing, rationality, and computer technology. Journal of Law and Society 22, 549-570.
28. Magistrates' Association Sentencing Guidelines (1995). Magistrates' Association: London.
29. Marvel, T. & Moody, C. (1996) Determinate sentencing and abolishing parole: the long-term impacts on prisons and crime. Criminology 34, 107-128.
30. Munro, C. (1992) Judicial independence and judicial functions. In Sentencing, Judicial Discretion and Training (Munro, C. & Wasik, M., Eds). Sweet and Maxwell: London.
31. Nagel, I.H. (1990) Structuring sentencing discretion: the new federal sentencing guidelines. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 80, 883-943.
32. O'Connell, M. & Whelan, A (1996) Taking wrongs seriously: perceptions of crime seriousness. British Journal of Criminology 36, 299-317.
33. Owens, M.W. (1995) California's three strikes law: desperate times require desperate measures - but will it work?. Pacific Law Journal 26, 881-919.
34. Padfield, N. (1993) Parole and the life sentence prisoner. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 32, 87-98.
35. Penal Affairs Consortium (1995) Sentencing and Early Release: The Home Secretary's Proposals. Penal Affairs Consortium: London.
36. Polvi, N. & Pease, K. (1991) Parole and its problems: a Canadian - English comparison. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 30, 218-230.
37. Radzinowicz, L. & Hood, R. (1979) Judicial discretion and sentencing standards: Victoria attempts to solve a perennial problem. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127, 1288-1349.
38. Reuben, R.C. (1995) Get tough stance draws fiscal criticism. American Bar Association Journal 16.
39. Richardson, G. (1993) Law Process and Custody: Prisoners and Patients. Weidenfeld and Nicolson: London.
40. Spencer, J.N. (1991) Judicial review of criminal proceedings. Criminal Law Review 38, 259-263.
41. Straw, J. (1996) Honesty, Consistency and Progression in Sentencing. The Labour Party: London.
42. Tata, C., Hutton, N., Wilson, J.N. & Paterson, A.A. (1995) Sentencing and computerised information systems : the process and progress of the Scottish prototype. Juridical Review 6, 486-503.
43. Carlisle Committee (1988) The Parole System in England and Wales: Report of the Review Committee. HMSO: London. Cm. 532.
44. Thomas, D.A. (1979) Principles of Sentencing. Heinemann: London.
45. Thomas, D.A. (1982) The justice model of sentencing - its implications for the English sentencing system. In The Future of Sentencing, Occasional Paper No. 8. Institute of Criminology: Cambridge.
46. Thomas, D.A. (1992) Towards a new tarriff. Sentencing News 4, 12.
47. Thomas, D.A. (1994) Commentary on R v Johnson. Criminal Law Review 41, 537-539.
48. Thomas, D.A. (1996) The white paper. Sentencing News 2, 6-11.
49. Thomas, D.A. (1997) Honesty in Sentencing. Sentencing News 1, 11-12.
50. Tonry M. (1996) Sentencing Matters. Oxford University Press: New York
51. von Hirsch, A & Ashworth, A. (Eds) (1992) Principled Sentencing. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.
52. Walker, N. & Hough, M. (Eds) (1988) Public Attitudes to Sentencing: Surveys from Five Countries. Gower: Aldershot.
53. Walker, N. & Padfield, N. (1996) Sentencing: Theory Law and Practice. Butterworths: London.
54. Wasik, M. (1981) Prison conditions and sentencing policy: problems of division of function. Justice of the Peace 146, 416-418, 429-431.
55. Wooton, J. (1995) Truth in sentencing: why states should make violent criminals do their time. University of Daytona Law Review 20, 779-792.
56. Zeigler, F.A. & Del Carmen, R.V. (1996) Constitutional issues arising from "Three Strikes and You're Out" legislation. In Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy (Shichor, D. & Sechrest, D.K., Eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, California.