Jury reform: Of myths and moral panics

International Journal of the Sociology of Law

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 363-384

  Duff, Peter ^a   Findlay, Mark ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031314081     PISSN: 01946595     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijsl.1997.0049     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baldwin, J. & McConville, M. (1979) Jury Trials. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
2. British Broadcasting Corporation (1993) Not Proven - That Bastard Verdict. BBC: Scotland, Focal Point Documentary, 13th May.
3. Blake, N. (1988) The case for the jury. In The Jury Under Attack (Findlay M. & Duff, P., Eds). Butterworths: London, pp. 140-160.
4. Bonnington, A. (1993) Third option for Scots juries. Herald, 13th May.
5. Cohen, S. (1980) Folk Devils and Moral Panics. Martin and Robertson: Oxford.
6. Darbyshire, P. (1991) The lamp that shows that freedom lives - is it worth the candle? Criminal Law Review, 741-752.
7. Duff, P. (1996) The not proven verdict: jury mythology and moral panics. Juridical Review 41, 1-12.
8. Duff, P. & Findlay, M. (1982) The jury in England: practice and ideology. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 10, 253-265.
9. Duff, P. & Findlay, M. (1983) Jury vetting - the jury under attack. Legal Studies 3, 159-173.
10. Duff, P. & Findlay, M. (1988) The politics of jury reform. In The Jury Under Attack (Findlay, M. & Duff, P., Eds). Butterworths: London, pp. 209-227.
11. Duff, P., Findlay, M., Howarth, C. & Chan, T. ( 1992) Juries: A Hong Kong Perspective. Hong Kong University Press: Hong Kong.
12. Enright, S. (1989) Unlocking the jury room. New Law Journal 139, 655-656.
13. Findlay, M. (1994) Jury Management in New South Wales. AIJA: Melbourne.
14. Findlay, M. (1996) Policies of secrecy and denial: barriers to jury reform. Current Issues in Criminal Justice (in press).
15. Findlay, M. & Duff, P. (1988) The Jury Under Attack. Butterworths: London.
16. Findlay, M. & Reynolds, S. (1995a) Jury trial in Russia: evaluation of juror responses; preliminary findings. Unpublished research paper.
17. Findlay, M. & Reynolds, S. (1995b) Attitudes of legal professionals to jury trial in Russia: preliminary findings. Unpublished research paper.
18. Freeman, M. (1981) The jury on trial. Current Legal Problems 34, 65-111.
19. Gow, N. (1995) The verdict on not proven. Green's Criminal Law Bulletin 13.
20. Harding, R. (1988) Jury performance in complex cases. In The Jury Under Attack (Findlay, M. & Duff, P., Eds). Butterworths: London, pp. 74-94.
21. Kalvin, H. & Zeisel, H. (1966) The American Jury. Little, Brown and Co: Boston.
22. Lacey N. (1994) Making sense of criminal justice. In Criminal Justice (Lacey N., Ed.). Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 1-35.
23. Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Reports of the Sittings. Government Printer: Hong Kong.
24. Legislative Council of Hong Kong. (1986). Report of the Select Committee on the Problems Involved in the Prosecution and Trial of Complex Commercial Crimes Vols. 1 & 2. Government Printer: Hong Kong.
25. Levi, M. (1988) The role of the jury in complex cases. In The Jury Under Attack (Findlay, M. & Duff, P., Eds). Butterworths: London, pp. 95-111.
26. Litton, H. (1988) Editorial. Hong Kong Law Journal 18, 462-466.
27. McBarnet, D. (1979) Conviction. McMillan: London.
28. McEldowney J. (1979) Stand by for the crown - an historical analysis. Criminal Law Review, 272-283.
29. McCluskey Lord (1994) Fiddling with Scottish justice. Scottish Legal Action Group Bulletin, 69-72.
30. McHugh, M. (1988) Juror's deliberations, jury secrecy, public policy and the laws of contempt. In The Jury Under Attack (Findlay, M. & Duff, P., Eds). Butterworths: London, pp. 56-73.
31. Morrow, P. (1988) Complexity causes cock up. Law Society of Hong Kong Gazette 11, 17-18.
32. Mungham, G. & Bankowski, Z. (1976) The jury in the legal system. Sociology of Law. (Carlen, P., Ed.). University of Keele Sociological Review Monograph, pp. 202-225.
33. New South Wales Law Reform Commission (1985). The Jury in a Criminal Trial: Discussion Paper on Criminal Procedure (No. 27). N.S.W. Government Printer: Sydney.
34. Parliamentary Sub-committee on Legal Reform, RSFSR (1991). Concept of Judicial Reform in the Russian Federation 44, Item No. 1435.
35. Roskill Committee (1986). Fraud Trials Committee Report. HMSO: London.
36. Sanders, A. & Young, R. (1994) Criminal Justice. Butterworths: London.
37. Scottish Office (1994a) Firm and Fair. HMSO: Cmnd. 2600.
38. Scottish Office (1994b) Juries and Verdicts. Scottish Office: Edinburgh.
39. Sheehan, A. (1990) Criminal Procedure. Butterworths: Edinburgh.
40. Thaman, S. (1995) The resurrection of trial by jury in Russia. Stanford Journal of International Law 31/1, 61-274.
41. Thomson Committee (1975) Criminal Procedure in Scotland (Second Report). HMSO: Edinburgh.
42. Willock, I. (1966) The Origins and Development of the Jury in Scotland. Stair Society: Edinburgh.
43. Willock, I. (1993) The verdict muddle - a way out. Scottish Legal Action Group Bulletin 5.
44. Zander, M. & Henderson, P. (1993). Crown Court Study. HMSO: London (Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study No. 19).