Investigation of Raters' and Raters' Reactions to Three Methods of Performance Appraisal: BOS, BARS, and GRS

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 396-404

  Tziner, Aharon ^a   Kopelman, Richard ^b   Joanis, Christine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c Canadian National (CN)   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031312271     PISSN: 08250383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.1997.tb00145.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bernadin, H.-J., & Beatty, R.W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston, MA: Kent.
2. Borman, E.V. (1982). Validity of behavioral assessment for predicting military recruiter performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 3-9.
3. Campbell, J.P., Dunnette, M.D., Arvey, R.D., & Hellervick, L.W. (1973). The development and evaluation of behaviorally based rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 15-22.
4. Kane, J.S., & Kane, K.F. (1992). Extension and validation of a model for motivated rating error. Unpublished manuscript. University of North Carolina at Greenboro, NC.
5. Latham, G.P., & Wexley, K.N. (1981). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Murphy, K.R., & Cleveland, J.N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Nathan, B.R., Mohrman, A.M., Jr., & Milliman, J. (1991). Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance satisfactions: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 352-369.
8. Riggio, R.E., & Cole, E.J. (1992). Agreement between subordinate and super ratings of supervisory performance and effects on self and subordinate job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 151-158.
9. Russell, J.S., & Goode, D.L. (1988). An analysis of managers' reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 63-67.
10. Schwab, D.P., Heneman, H.G., III, & DeCotiis, T. (1975). Behaviorally anchored scales: A review of the literature. Personnel Psychology, 28, 549-562.
11. Smith, P.C., & Kendall, L.M. (1963). Retranslation of expectstion: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149-155.
12. Tharenou, P. (1995). The impact of a developmental performance appraisal program on employee perceptions in an Australian federal agency. Group and Organization Management, 20, 245-271.
13. Tziner, A. (1990). Organization staffing and work adjustment. New York: Praeger.
14. Tziner, A., & Kopelman, R.E. (1988). Effects of rating format on goal-setting dimensions: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 323-326.
15. Wiersma, V.C., Van Den Berg, P.T., & Latham, G.P. (1995). Dutch reactions to behavioral observation, behavioral expectation, and trait scales. Group and Organization Management, 20, 297-309.