A comparison of different phonetic materials in the perceptive analysis of dysphonia;Comparaison de differents materiaux phonetiques pour l'analyse perceptive des dysphonies

Revue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 247-252

  Revis J ^a   Giovanni, A ^a   Wuyts, F ^b   Triglia, J M ^a  

^a TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Dysphonia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHONETICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPEECH DISORDER; VOICE; VOWEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LARYNX DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; PHONATION;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONATION; PHONETICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VOICE DISORDERS;

EID: 0031310688     PISSN: 00351334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. KREIMAN J, GERRATT BR, KEMPSTER GB, ERMAN A, BERKE GS. Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality : Review, Tutorial, and a Framework for Future Research. J SPEECH HEAR RES. 1993;36:21-40.
2. HAMMARBERG B, FRITZELL B, GAUFFIN J, SUNDBERG J, WEDIN L. Perceptual and Acoustic Correlates of Abnormal Voice Qualities. ACTA OTOLARYNGOL (STOCKH) 1980;90:441-451.
3. DE BODT M, VAN DE REINING, WUYTS F, LAMBRECHTS L. The Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Disorders. ACTA OTOLARYNGOL BELG. 1996;50:283-291.
4. HIRANO M Psycho-Acoustic Evaluation of Voice : GRBAS Scale for Evaluating the Hoarse Voice. In : Hirano M (eds) : Clinical Examination of Voice. Springer Verlag Wien. 1981;81-84.
5. DEJONCKERE P, OBBENS C, DE MOOR GM, WIENECKE GH. Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia . Reliability and Relevance. FOLIA PHONIATR. 1993;45:75-83.
6. DE BODT M, WUYTS F, VAN DE HEYNING PH, CROUX C. Test-Retest Study of the GRBAS Scale : Influence of Experience and Professional Background on Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality. J VOICE. 1997;11:74-80.
7. ANDERS L, HOLLIEN H, HURME P, SONNINEN A, WENDLER J : Perception of Hoarseness by Several Classes of Listeners. FOLIA PHONIATR. 1988;40:91-100.
8. ASKENFELD A, HAMMARBERG B. Speech Waveform Perturbation Analysis . a Perceptual-Acoustical Comparison of Seven Measures. J SPEECH HEAR RES. 1986;29:50-64.
9. KREIMAN J, GERRATT BR, PRECODA K, BERKE GS. Individual Differences in Voice Quality Perception. J SPEECH HEAR RES. 1992;35:512-520.
10. KINGHOLZ F. Acoustic Representation of Speaking Voice Quality. J VOICE. 1990;4:213-219.
11. KOIKE Y. Application of Acoustic Measures for the Evaluation of Laryngeal Dysfunction. STUDIA PHONOL. 1973;7:17-23.
12. SCHOENTGEN J. Jitter in Sustained Vowels and Isolated Sentences Produced by Dysphonic Speakers. SPEECH COM. 1989;8:61-79.
13. BASSICH CJ, LUDLOW CL. The Use of Perceptual Method by New Clinicians for Assessing Voice Quality. J SPEECH HEAR Dis. 1986;51:125-133.
14. Childers D, Lee C. Vocal Quality Factors . Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception. J ACOUST Soc AM. 1991;37:2394-2410.
15. WOLFE V, CORNELL R, PALMER C. Acoustic Correlates of Pathologic Voice Types. J SPEECH HEAR RES. 1991;34:509-516.
16. RAMMAGE LA, PEPPARD RC, BLESS DM. Aerodynamic, Laryngoscopic, and Perceptual-Acoustic Characteristics in Dysphonic Females with Posterior Glottal Chinks : a Retrospective Study. J VOICE. 1992;6:64-78.
17. GIOVANNI A, ROBERT D, ESTUBLIER N, TESTON B, ZANARET M, CANNONI M. Objective evaluation of dysphonia : preliminary results of a device allowing simultaneous acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. FOLIA PHONIATR LOGOP. 1996;48:175-185.
18. DE KROM G Consistency and Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Fragments. J SPEECH HEAR RES. 1994;37 985-1000.
19. GERRATT BR, KREIMAN J, ANTONANZA-BARROSO N, BERKE GS. Comparing Internal and External Standards in Voice Quality Judgments. J SPEECH HEAR RES. 1993;36:14-20.
20. WOLFE V, CORNELL R, FITCH J. Sentence/Vowel Correlation in the Evaluation of Dysphonia, J VOICE. 1995;9:297-303.