|
Volumn 36, Issue 1-4, 1997, Pages 391-392
|
A randomized comparison between minilaparotomy and conventional approach for aortoiliac reconstructive surgery.
a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANALGESIA;
AORTA DISEASE;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DEFECATION;
DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION;
EATING;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME;
HUMAN;
ILIAC ARTERY;
INCIDENCE;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LAPAROTOMY;
LENGTH OF STAY;
LONGITUDINAL STUDY;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE;
PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
STRESS;
SURVIVAL RATE;
VIDEORECORDING;
VITAL CAPACITY;
WOUND DRAINAGE;
ANALGESIA;
AORTIC DISEASES;
ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES;
DEFECATION;
DRAINAGE;
EATING;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME;
HUMANS;
ILIAC ARTERY;
INCIDENCE;
INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LAPAROTOMY;
LENGTH OF STAY;
LONGITUDINAL STUDIES;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
STRESS;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;
SURVIVAL RATE;
VIDEO RECORDING;
VITAL CAPACITY;
|
EID: 0031310150
PISSN: 02314614
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (0)
|