The personal origins of attachment theory: An interview with Mary Salter Ainsworth

Psychoanalytic Study of the Child

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 386-405

  Rudnytsky, Peter L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; OBJECT RELATION; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY;

HUMANS; OBJECT ATTACHMENT; PSYCHOANALYTIC INTERPRETATION; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY;

EID: 0031308513     PISSN: 00797308     EISSN: 24743356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00797308.1997.11822469     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. “Becoming Attached,” Atlantic Monthly, February 1990, 35-70.
2. B. Klopfer, M. D. Ainsworth, W. G. Klopfer, and R. R. Holt, Developments in the Rorschach Technique, Vol. 1 (Yonkers-on-Hudson, New York: World Book, 1954).
3. John D. Sutherland, Fairbairn’s Journey into the Interior (London: Free Association Books, 1989).
4. Mary D. Salter Ainsworth and John Bowlby, “An Ethological Approach to Personality Development,” American Psychologist, 46 (1991), 331-41.
5. John Bowlby, “The Study and Reduction of Group Tensions in the Family, “ Human Relations, 2 (1949), 123-28.
6. See John Bowlby, “Grief and Mourning in Infancy and Early Childhood,” Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 15 (1960), 9-52.
7. John Bowlby, Separation: Anxiety and Anger (1973; rpt. London: Hogarth Press, 1985), 364-65.
8. Robert R. Sears, Suroey of Objective Studies of Psychoanalytic Concepts (New York: Social Sciences Research Council, 1943).