Retropubic and perineal approaches: In favour of perineal radical prostatectomy;Voies rétropubienne et périnéale : Plaidoyer pour la prostatectomie radicale par voie périnéale

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 976-983

  Salomon, Laurent ^a   Colombel, Marc ^a   Patard, Jean Jacques ^a   Contremoulins, Isabelle ^a   Bellot, Jacqueline ^a   Lefrere Belda, Marie Aude ^a   Gasman, Daniel ^a   Chopin, Dominique ^a   Abbou, Claude Clément ^a  

^a HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGED; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0031307179     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BISHOFF J.T., REYES A., THOMPSON I.M., et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy can be omitted in selected patients carcinoma of the prostate: developpment of a system of patient selection. Urology, 1995, 45, 270-274.
2. BLUESTEIN D.L., BOSTWICK G , BERGSTRALH E.J., OESTERLING J.E. Eliminating the need for bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in select patients with prostate cancer. J. Urol , 1994, 151, 1315-1320.
3. BOCCON-GIBOD L. Technique de la piostatectomie radicale périnéale pour cancer prostatique localisé. Prog. Urol., 1995, 5, 415-425
4. DOUBLET J D., LAGRANGE L., CIOFU C., THIBAULT P , GATTEGNO B. Prostatectomie radicale, comparaison de la voie périnéale et de la vote rétropubienne (40 patients). Résultats préliminaires. Prog. Urol., 1994, 4, 33-39.
5. FRAZIER H.A, ROBERTSON J.E , PAULSON D.F Radical prostatectomy the pros and cons of the perineal versus, retropubic approach J. Urol , 1992, 147, 888-890.
6. HAAB F., BOCCON-GIBOD L., DELMAS V., BOCCON-GIBOD L., TOUBLANC M. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer. Brit J. Urol. 1994, 74, 626-629.
7. KAMPANGA M., DAHMANI F., HAKAMI F , DEVOLDERE G , ABOURACHID H. Sténose de l'anastomose vésico-uréthrale. Notre expérience sur 114 prostatectomies radicales. Prog. Urol., 1994, 4, 683-687.
8. LANGE P.H., REDDY P.K. Technical nuances and surgical results of radical retropubic prostatectomy in 150 patients. J. Urol., 1987, 138, 348-354.
9. LEVY J.B., RAMCHANDANI P , BERLIN J W., BRODERICK G.A., WEIN A.J. Vesicourethral healing following radical prostatectomy: is it related to surgical approach? Urology, 1994, 44, 888-892.
10. MARECHAL J.M. La prostatectomie radicale: résultats et perspectives. Prog. Urol., 1994, 5, 729-917.
11. MARSHALL F.F., HORTOPAN S.C., LAKSHAMANAN Y. Partial resection of symphisis: an aid in radical prostatecomy. J. Urol., 1997, 157, 578-579.
12. MC NEAL J.E., REDWINE E.A., FREIHA F.S. AND STAMEY T.S. Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread. Am. J. Surg. Path., 1988, 12, 897-906.
13. MELMAN A., GLADSHTEYN M., STIFELMAN M. Curage Iymphatique coeliscopique et prostatectomie radicale par voie périnéale: une stratégie pour le traitement du cancer prostatique. Prog. Urol , 1993, 3, 197-204.
14. MOKULIS J., THOMPSON I. Radical prostatectomy: is the perineal approach more difficult to learn? J. Urol., 1997, 157, 230-232.
15. PARRA R.O., BOULLIER J.A., RAUSCHER J.A., CUMMINGS J.M. The value of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in conjunction with radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol., 1994, 151, 1599-1602.
16. PARRA R.O., ISORNA S., GARCIA PEREZ M.A., CUMMINGS J M., BOULLIER J. Radical perineal prostatectomy without pelvic lymphadenectomy: selection criteria and early results. J. Urol , 1996, 155, 612-615.
17. PAULSON D F. Radical perineal prostatectomy. Urol. Cl. N. Am., 1980, 7, 847-853.
18. SALOMON L., COLOMBEL M , PATARD J.J. et al. Volume et représentation spatiale des tumeurs au sein de la glande prostatique. Prog. Urol., 1997, 7, 442-448
19. SURYA B., PROVET J., JOHANSON K. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risks factors and management. J. Urol., 1990, 143, 755-758
20. TEICHMAN J.M., REDDY P K., HULBERT J.C. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology, 1995, 5, 823-830.
21. WALSH P.C , LEPOR H., EGGLESTON J.D Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate, 1983, 4, 473-480.
22. WELDON V.E., TAVEL F.R., NEUWIRTH H., COHEN R. Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy. J. Urol., 1995, 153, 1565-1569.
23. WELDON V.E., TAVEL F.R. Potency-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy: anatomy, surgical technique and initial results. J. Urol., 1988, 140, 559-562.
24. YOUNG H.H The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate: being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was earned out in four cases. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 1905, 16, 315-319.