The teaching of all-ceramic restorations in north american dental schools: Materials and techniques employed

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 86-93

  Frazier, Kevin B ^a   Mjör, Ivar A ^b  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CURRICULUM; DENTAL SURGERY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NORTH AMERICA; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; TEACHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CERAMICS; CURRICULUM; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; NORTH AMERICA; PROSTHODONTICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEACHING;

EID: 0031304284     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00922.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Christensen GJ. A look at state-of-the-art tooth-colored inlays and onlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123:66–70.
2. Christensen GJ. Product use survey, 1995. CRA Newsletter 1995; 19:1–4.
3. Phillips RW. Skinner’s science of dental materials. 9th Ed. Philadelphia: WE Saunders, 1991.
4. Garber DA, Goldstein RE, eds. Porcelain and composite inlays and onlays: Esthetic posterior restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1994.
5. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review. J Prothet Dent 1990; 63:619–626.
6. Calamia JR, Simonsen RJ. Effect of coupling agents on bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1984; 63:179 (Abstr 79).
7. Frazier KB. Miör IA. The teaching of all-ceramic restorations in North American dental schools: Curricular requirements and indications. J Esthet Dent 1996; 8:1–7.
8. Adar P. Laboratoy procedures. In: Garber DA, Goldrtein RE, eds. Porcelain and composite inlays and onbys: Esthetic posterior restorationr. Chicago: Quintessence 1994:71–74.
9. Gilpatrick RO. Dental cements, bases and liners. In: Hardin JF. ed. Clark’s clinical dentistry Vol. 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1989:chapter 20:1–2.
10. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEM A on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992;8:125–130.
11. Hilton TJ. Cavity sealers, liners, and boses: Current philosophies and indications for use. Oper Dent 1996; 21:134–146.
12. Horn HH. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin North Am 1983; 27:671–684.
13. Dietschi D, Maeder M. Meyer J-M, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990; 21:323–831.
14. Cardash HS, Baharav H, Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. The effect of porcelain color on the hardness of luting composite resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:620–623.
15. Swift EJ. An update on glass ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1988; 19:125–130.
16. Johnson CH. Powell LV. DeRouen TA. Evaluation and control of post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: Zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:38–46.
17. Raimondo RL, Richardson JT, Weidner B. Polished versus autoglazed dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64:553–557.
18. Kawai K, Hayashi M. Torii M. Tsuchitani Y. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126:9414–1419.