|
|
Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 222-248
|
|
A United Methodist approach to end-of-life decisions: intentional ambiguity or ambiguous intentions.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
CLERGY;
CONFLICT;
COUNSELING;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA;
FAMILY;
FREEDOM;
GROUP PROCESS;
HISTORY;
HOSPICE;
HUMAN;
INDIVIDUALITY;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LIVING WILL;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL STRESS;
METHODIST CHURCH;
MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS;
NOMENCLATURE;
PAIN;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONHOOD;
PHYSICIAN;
POLICY;
POLITICS;
PROBABILITY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RELIGION;
RELIGIOUS APPROACH;
SUICIDE;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
THEOLOGY;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNCERTAINTY;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
METHODIST CHURCH;
RELIGIOUS APPROACH;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
CHRISTIANITY;
CLERGY;
DECISION MAKING;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
EUTHANASIA;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FAMILY;
FREEDOM;
GROUP PROCESSES;
HISTORY;
HOSPICES;
HUMANS;
INDIVIDUALITY;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY;
PAIN;
PASTORAL CARE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONHOOD;
PERSONS;
PHYSICIANS;
POLITICS;
PROBABILITY;
PROTESTANTISM;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RELIGION;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
SUICIDE;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TERMINOLOGY;
THEOLOGY;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNCERTAINTY;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0031302694
PISSN: 13803603
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/cb/3.3.222 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (3)
|
|
References (0)
|
