Recycling effects on ceramic brackets: A dimensional, weight and shear bond strength analysis

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 629-636

  Martina, Roberto ^a   Laino, Alberto ^a   Cacciafesta, Vittorio ^a   Cantiello, Pasquale ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESIVE AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; ENAMEL; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; RECYCLING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EQUIPMENT REUSE; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0031302363     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/19.6.629     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bordeaux J M, Moore R N, Bagby M D 1994 Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 105: 552-560
2. Buchman D J L 1980 Effects of recycling on metallic direct-bond orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics 77: 654-668
3. Hixson M E, Brantley W A, Pincsak T T, Conover J P 1982 Changes in bracket slot tolerance following recycling of direct bond metallic orthodontic appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 447-454
4. Hyer K E 1989 An in vitro study of shear and tensile bond strengths comparing mechanically and chemically bonded ceramic brackets with three bonding agents. Master's Thesis. University of Iowa. Iowa City
5. Joseph V P, Rossouw E 1990 The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97: 121-125
6. Laino A, Cacciafesta V 1994 Attacchi ortodontici in ceramica: analisi morfo-strutturale al S.E.M., forze di distacco in vitro, riciclaggio termo-ultrasonico. Ortognatodonzia Italiana 3: 819-842
7. Laino A, Cacciafesta V, Cantiello P 1995 Effetti del debonding e siti di frattura dei brackets in ceramica: confronto Ira un sistema adesivo fotopolimerizzante ed uno chimicopolimerizzante allo 'Shear Test'. Ortognatodonzia Italiana 4: 333-340
8. Lew K K K, Djeng S K 1990 Recycling ceramic brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 24: 44-47
9. Lew K K K, Chew C L, Lee K W 1991 A comparison of shear bond strengths between new and recycled ceramic brackets. European Journal of Orthodontics 13: 306-310
10. Regan D, Van Noort R, O'Keeffe C 1990 The effects of recycling on the tensile bond strength of new and clinically used stainless steel orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. British Journal of Orthodontics 17: 137-145
11. Reynolds I R 1975 A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British Journal of Orthodontics 2: 171-178
12. Swartz M 1988 Ceramic brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 22: 82-88
13. Wang W N, Lu T C 1991 Bond strength with various etching times on young permanent teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 100: 72-79