Antibody transmitting ability of hens from lines of chickens differing in response to SRBC antigen

British Poultry Science

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 480-484

  Boa Amponsem, K ^a   Dunnington, E A ^a   Siegel, P B ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GALLUS GALLUS; OVIS ARIES;

ANTIGEN; MERCAPTOETHANOL;

AGING; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CHICKEN; EGG LAYING; ERYTHROCYTE; FEMALE; IMMUNOLOGY; PASSIVE IMMUNIZATION; SHEEP; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AGING; ANIMALS; ANTIBODY FORMATION; ANTIGENS; CHICKENS; ERYTHROCYTES; FEMALE; IMMUNITY, MATERNALLY-ACQUIRED; MERCAPTOETHANOL; OVIPOSITION; SHEEP; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031300847     PISSN: 00071668     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00071669708418025     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. DELHANTY, JJ. & SOLOMON, J.B. (1966) The nature of antibodies to goat erythrocytes in the developing chicken. Immunology, 11: 103-113.
2. GROSS, W.B., DOMERMUTH, C.H. & SIEGEL, P.B. (1988) Genetic and environmental effects on the response of chickens to avian adenovirus group II infection. Avian Pathology, 17: 767-774.
3. HELLER. E.D., LEITNER, N., DRABKIN, N. & MELAMED, D. (1990) Passive immunization of chicks against Escherichia coli. Avian Pathology, 19: 345-354.
4. KREUKNIET, M.B. & VAN DER ZIJPP, A.J. (1990) Effects of different doses of sheep erythrocytes on the humoral immune response of chicken lines selected for high or low antibody production. Poultry Science, 69: 608-614.
5. LEITNER, G., GUTMAN, M., HELLER, E.D., YONASH, N. & CAHANER, A. (1994) Parental effect on the humoral immune response to Escherichia coli and Newcastle disease virus in young broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 73: 1034-1041.
6. MARTIN, A., DUNNINGTON, E.A., GROSS, P.B., BRILES, W.E., BRILES, R.W. & SIEGEL, P.B. (1990) Production traits and alloantigen systems in lines of chickens selected for high or low antibody responses to sheep erythrocytes. Poultry Science, 69: 871-878.
7. NORDSKOG, A.W. & PEVZNER, I.Y. (1977) Sex-linkage us maternal antibodies in the genetic control of disease. World's Poultry Science Journal, 33: 21-30.
8. 2 crosses of chicken lines. Genetics Selection Evolution, 25: 283-296.
9. SCHWARTZ, L.D. (1994) Poultry Health Handbook (University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State College of Agriculture).
10. SIEGEL, P.B. & GROSS, W.B. (1980) Production and persistence of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. 1. Directional selection. Poultry Science, 59: 1-5.
11. SIEGEL, P.B., GROSS, W.B. & CHERRY, J.A. (1982) Correlated responses of chickens to selection for production of antibodies to sheep erythrocytes. Animal Blood Groups Biochemical Genetics, 13: 291-297.
12. UBOSI, C.O., DUNNINGTON, E.A., GROSS, W.B. & SIEGEL, P.B. (1985) Divergent selection of chickens for antibody response to sheep erythrocytes: Kinetics of primary and secondary immunizations. Avian Diseases, 29: 347-355.
13. WEGMANN, T.G. & SMITHIES, O. (1966) A simple hernagglutination system requiring small amounts of red blood cells and antibodies. Transfusion, 6: 67-73.