The rate of force generation by the myocardium is not influenced by afterload

Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1471-1477

  Fioretto, J R ^a   Okoshi, M P ^a   Okoshi, K ^a   Cicogna, A C ^a   Bonatto, R C ^a   Padovani, C R ^a   Tucci, P J F ^a,b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Afterload; dP dt; dT dt; Isometric contractions; Papillary muscle; Ventricular function

Indexed keywords

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DOG; HEART; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART PAPILLARY MUSCLE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; DOGS; HEART; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; PAPILLARY MUSCLES; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0031300452     PISSN: 0100879X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X1997001200015     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wallace AG, Skinner NS & Mitchel JH (1963). Hemodynamic determinants of the maximal rate of rise of left ventricular pressure. American Journal of Physiology, 205: 30-36.
2. Barnes GE, Bishop VS, Horwitz LD & Kaspar RL (1973). The maximum derivatives of left ventricular pressure and transverse internal diameter as indices of the inotropic state of the left ventricle in conscious dogs. Journal of Physiology, 235: 571-590.
3. Mahler F, Ross Jr J, O'Rourke RA & Covell JW (1975). Effects of changes in preload, afterload and inotropic state on ejection and isovolumic phase measures of contractility in the conscious dog. American Journal of Cardiology, 35: 626-634.
4. Schmidt HD & Hoppe H (1978). Preload dependence of dP/dt max, Vce max and calculated Vmax compared to the inotropic sensitivity of these indices of cardiac contractility. Basic Research in Cardiology, 73: 380-393.
5. Kass DA, Maughan WL, Guo ZM, Kono A, Sunagawa K & Sagawa K (1987). Comparative influence of load versus inotropic states on indexes of ventricular contractility: experimental and theoretical analysis based on pressure-volume relationships. Circulation, 76: 1422-1436.
6. Little WC, Cheng CP, Mumma M, Igarashi Y, Vinten-Johansen J & Johnston WE (1989). Comparison of measures of left ventricular contractile performance derived from pressure-volume loops in conscious dogs. Circulation, 80: 1378-1387.
7. Konishi T, Nakamura Y, Kato I & Kawai C (1992). Dependence of peak dP/dt and mean ejection rate on load and effect of inotropic agents on the relationship between peak dP/dt and left ventricular developed pressure - assessed in the isolated working rat heart and cardiac muscles. International Journal of Cardiology, 35: 333-341.
8. Quinones MA, Gaasch WH & Alexander JK (1976). Influence of acute changes in preload, afterload, contractile state and heart rate on ejection and isovolumic indices of myocardial contractility in man. Circulation, 53: 293-302.
9. Siegel JH, Sonnenblick EH, Judge RD & Wilson WS (1964). The quantification of myocardial contractility in dog and man. Cardiologia, 45: 189-220.
10. Bugge-Asperheim B & Kiil F (1973). Preload, contractility, and afterload as determinants of stroke volume during elevation of aortic blood pressure in dogs. Cardiovascular Research, 7: 528-541.
11. Elzinga G, Noble MIM & Stubbs J (1977). The effect of an increase in aortic pressure upon the inotropic state of cat and dog left ventricles. Journal of Physiology, 273: 597-615.
12. Starling MR, Montgomery DG & Walsh RA (1989). Load dependence of the single beat maximal pressure (stress)/volume ratios in humans Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 14: 345-353.
13. Clancy RL, Graham Jr TP, Ross Jr J, Sonnenblick EH & Braunwald E (1968). Influence of aortic pressure-induced homeometric autoregulation on myocardial performance. American Journal of Physiology, 214: 1186-1192.
14. Henning RJ & Levy MN (1991). Effects of autonomic nerve stimulation asynchrony, and load on dP/dt max and on dP/dt min. American Journal of Physiology, 260: H1290-H1298.
15. Schipke JD, Stocks I, Sunderdiek U & Arnold G (1993). Effect of changes in aortic pressure and in coronary arterial pressure on left ventricular geometry and function. Anrep vs. gardenhose effect. Basic Research in Cardiology, 88: 621-637.
16. Little WC (1985). The left ventricular dP/ dtmax - end-diastolic volume relation in closed-chest dogs. Circulation Research, 56: 808-815.
17. Morrison DF (1976). Multivariate Statistical Methods. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Kogabusha Ltd., Tokyo.
18. Monroe RG, Gamble WJ, LaFarge CG, Kumar AE, Stark J, Sanders GL, Phornphutkul C & Davis M (1972). The Anrep effect reconsidered. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 51: 2573-2583.
19. Walston A, Rembert JC, Fedor JM & Greenfield Jr JC (1978). Regional myocardial blood flow after sudden aortic constriction in awake dogs. Circulation Research, 42: 419-425.
20. Nichols CG, Hanck DA & Jewell BR (1988). The Anrep effect: an intrinsic myocardial mechanism. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 66: 924-929.
21. Leach JK, Brady AJ, Skipper BJ & Millis DL (1980). Effects of active shortening on tension development of rabbit papillary muscle. American Journal of Physiology, 238: H8-H13.
22. Housmans PR, Lee NKM & Blinks JR (1983). Active shortening retards the decline of the intracellular calcium transient in mammalian heart muscle. Science, 221: 159-161.
23. Hunter WC (1989). End-systolic pressure as a balance between opposing effects of ejection. Circulation Research, 64: 265-275.
24. Suga H, Saeki Y & Sagawa K (1977). End-systolic force-length relationship of nonexcised canine papillary muscle. American Journal of Physiology, 233: H711-H717.
25. Abel RM & Reis RL (1970). Effect of coronary blood flow and perfusion pressure on left ventricular contractility in dogs. Circulation Research, 27: 961-971.
26. Arnold G, Kosche F, Miessner E, Neitzert A & Lochner W (1968). The importance of the perfusion pressure in the coronary arteries for the contractility and the oxygen consumption of the heart. Pflügers Archives, 299: 339-356.
27. Tucci PJF, Bregagnollo EA, Spadaro J, Cicogna AC & Ribeiro MCL (1984). Length dependence of activation studied in the isovolumic blood-perfused dog heart. Circulation Research, 55: 59-66.
28. Tucci PJF, Spadaro J, Cicogna AC & Bregagnollo EA (1980). Coronary perfusion pressure as a determinant of ventricular performance. Experientia, 36: 974-975.
29. Sarnoff SJ & Mitchel JH (1961). The regulation of the performance of the heart. American Journal of Medicine, 30: 747-765.
30. Haneda T, Watson PA & Morgan HE (1989). Elevated aortic pressure, calcium uptake, and protein synthesis in rat heart. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 21 (Suppl 1): 131-138.
31. Kitakaze M & Marban E (1939). Cellular mechanism of the modulation of contractile function by coronary perfusion pressure in ferret heart. Journal of Physiology, 414: 455-472.
32. Miller WP, Shimamoto N, Nellis SH & Liedtke AJ (1987). Coronary hyperperfusion and myocardial metabolism in isolated and intact hearts. American Journal of Physiology, 253: 1271-1278.