General Time-Reversible Distances with Unequal Rates across Sites: Mixing Γ and Inverse Gaussian Distributions with Invariant Sites

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 398-414

  Waddell, Peter J ^a   Steel, M A ^b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; HUMAN; PRIMATE; PROBABILITY;

ANIMALS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; PRIMATES;

EID: 0031297695     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0452     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adachi J., Hasegawa M. Time scale for the mitochondrial DNA tree of human evolution. The Origin and Past of Modern Humans as Viewed from DNA. 1994;World Scientific, Singapore. p. 46-68.
2. Adachi J., Hasegawa M. Tempo and mode of synonymous substitutions in Mitochondrial DNA of primates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;200-208.
3. Barry D., Hartigan J. A. Asynchronous distance between homologous DNA sequences. Biometrics. 43:1987;261-276.
4. Chang J. T. Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters. Math. Biosci. 134:1996;189-215.
5. Churchill G. A., von Haeseler A., Navidi W. C. Sample size for phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:1992;753-769.
6. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 1859;J. Murray, London.
7. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;401-410.
8. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:1981;368-376.
9. Felsenstein J. Numerical methods for inferring evolutionary trees. Quart. Rev. Biol. 57:1982;379-404.
10. Felsenstein J. Distance methods for inferring phylogenies: A justification. Evolution. 38:1984;16-24.
11. J. Felsenstein, 1993, PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) and Manual, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
12. Felsenstein J., Churchill G. A. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;93-104.
13. Fitch W. M., Margoliash M. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science. 155:1967;279-284.
14. Fitch W. M., Markowitz E. An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem. Genetics. 4:1970;579-593.
15. Gaut B. S., Lewis P. O. Success of maximum likelihood in the four-taxon case. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;152-162.
16. Gillespie J. H. Rates of molecular evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:1986;637-665.
17. Golding G. B. Estimates of DNA and protein sequence divergence: An examination of some assumptions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1:1983;125-142.
18. Gu X., Fu Y.-X., Li W.-H. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;546-557.
19. Hasegawa M., Fujiwara M. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 2:1993;1-5.
20. Hendy M. D., Penny D. A framework for the quantitativ study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;297-309.
21. Hendy M. D., Penny D., Steel M. A. Discrete Fourier analysis for evolutionary trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;3339-3343.
22. Hillis D. M., Mable B. K., Moritz C. Applications of molecular systematics. Hillis D. M., Moritz C., Mable B. K. Molecular Systematics. 1996;515-543 Sinauer, Sunderland.
23. Horai S., Satta Y., Hayasaka K., Kondo R., Inoue T., Ishida T., Hayashi S., Takahata N. Man's place in the Hominoidea revealed by mitochondrial DNA genealogy. J. Mol. Evol. 35:1992;32-43.
24. Horai S., Hayasaka K., Kondo R., Tsugane K., Takahata N. Recent origin of modern human revealed by complete sequences of hominoid mitochondrial DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;532-536.
25. Jin L., Nei M. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:1990;82-102.
26. Jukes T. H., Cantor C. R. Evolution of protein molecules. Munro H. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. 1969;21-132 Academic Press, New York.
27. Keilson J. Markov Chain Models - Rarity and Exponentiality. Appl. Math. Sci. 28:1979;Springer-Verlag, New York.
28. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:1980;111-120.
29. Kimura M. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:1981;454-458.
30. Lake J. A. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: Paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;1455-1459.
31. Lanave C., Preparata G., Saccone C., Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20:1984;86-93.
32. P. O. Lewis, D. L. Swofford, 1996, A general method for estimating evolutionary distances under any specific time reversible model.
33. Lockhart P. J., Larkum A. W., Steel M. A., Waddell P. J., Penny D. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: The problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;1930-1934.
34. Lockhart P. J., Steel M. A., Hendy M. D., Penny D. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;605-612.
35. Olsen G. J. The earliest phylogenetic branchings: Comparing rRNA-based evolutionary trees inferred with various techniques. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 52:1987;825-837.
36. Penny D., Hendy M. D., Steel M. A. Progress with methods for constructing evolutionary trees. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 7:1992;73-79.
37. Read T. R. C., Cressie N. A. C. Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data. 1988;Springer-Verlag, New York.
38. Reeves J. H. Heterogeneity in the substitution process of amino acid sites of proteins coded for by Mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 35:1992;17-31.
39. Ritland K., Clegg M. T. Evolutionary analysis of plant DNA sequences. Am. Nat. 130:1987;S74-S100.
40. Rodríguez F., Oliver J. L., Marin A., Medina J. R. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142:1990;485-501.
41. Saitou N. Maximum likelihood methods. Doolittle R. F. Molecular Evolution: Computer Analysis of Protein and Nucleic Acid Sequences. Methods in Enzymology. 183:1990;584-598 Academic Press, San Diego.
42. Sankoff D. Minimal mutation trees of sequences. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 28:1975;35-42.
43. Shoemaker J. S., Fitch W. M. Evidence from nuclear sequences that invariable sites should be considered when sequence divergence is calculated. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:1989;270-289.
44. Sidow A., Nguyen T., Speed T. P. Estimating the fraction of invariable codons with a capture-recapture method. J. Mol. Evol. 35:1992;253-260.
45. Steel M. A. Recovering a tree from a leaf colourations it generates under a Markov model. Appl. Math. Lett. 7:1994;19-23.
46. Steel M. A., Székely L., Erdös P. L., Waddell P. J. A complete family of phylogenetic invariants for any number of taxa under Kimura's 3ST model. N. Z. J. Bot. 31:1993;289-296.
47. Stuart A., Ord J. K. Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics. 1987;Edward Arnold, London.
48. Stuart A., Ord J. K. Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2, Distribution Theory: Classical Inference and Relationship. 1991;Edward Arnold, London.
49. D. L. Swofford, 1997, PAUP*, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
50. Swofford D. L., Olsen G. J., Waddell P. J., Hillis D. M. Phylogenetic inference. Hillis D. M., Moritz C., Mable B. K. Molecular Systematics. 1996;407-514 Sinauer, Sunderland.
51. Tajima F. Unbiased estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;677-688.
52. Tamura K. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G + C-content biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:1992;678-687.
53. Tamura K., Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;512-526.
54. Tavaré S. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life Sci. 17:1986;57-86.
55. P. J. Waddell, 1995, Statistical methods of phylogenetic analysis: Including Hadamard conjugations, LogDet transforms, and maximum likelihood, Massey University.
56. P. J. Waddell, 1997, Improved distance and variance estimation based on the VR-GTR transformation.
57. Waddell P. J., Penny D. Evolutionary trees of apes and humans from DNA sequence. Lock A. J., Peters C. R. Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution. 1996;53-73 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
58. Waddell P. J., Penny D., Moore T. Extending Hadamard conjugations to model sequence evolution with variable rates across sites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:1997a;33-50.
59. Waddell P. J., Steel M. A. General time reversible distances with unequal rates across sites. Research Report 143. 1996.
60. Waddell P. J., Lewis P. O., Swofford D. L. Distance based methods of inferring evolutionary trees. Phylogenetic Analysis Under Parsimony, Version 4.0 (PAUP* 4.0), Computer Program (by D. L. Swofford)," chap. 4. 1997b;Sinaur, Sunderland.
61. Yang Z. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;1396-1401.
62. Yang Z. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:1994;105-111.
63. Zharkikh A. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 39:1994;315-329.