|
|
Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 249-261
|
|
End-of-life decisions: Christian perspectives.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ART;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONSCIENCE;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA;
FREEDOM;
HUMAN;
INDIVIDUALITY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LONG TERM CARE;
MENTAL STRESS;
METHODIST CHURCH;
MORALITY;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONHOOD;
PHILOSOPHY;
PHYSICIAN;
RELIGION;
RELIGIOUS APPROACH;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SECULARISM;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
THEOLOGY;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
METHODIST CHURCH;
RELIGIOUS APPROACH;
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
CATHOLICISM;
CHRISTIANITY;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONSCIENCE;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DECISION MAKING;
EASTERN ORTHODOXY;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FREEDOM;
HUMAN BODY;
HUMANS;
INDIVIDUALITY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
MORALS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONHOOD;
PHILOSOPHY;
PHYSICIANS;
PROTESTANTISM;
RELIGION;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SECULARISM;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
SOCIAL VALUES;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TERMINALLY ILL;
THEOLOGY;
UNITED STATES;
VALUE OF LIFE;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0031296462
PISSN: 13803603
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/cb/3.3.249 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (4)
|
|
References (0)
|
