Money-Back Guarantees for IVF: An Ethical Critique

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 292-294

  Murray, Thomas H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMODIFICATION; CONTRACT; COST; ECONOMICS; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL FEE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

COMMODIFICATION; CONTRACTS; COST SHARING; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEES, MEDICAL; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; SOCIAL VALUES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031290420     PISSN: 10731105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1997.tb01411.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. J.A. Robertson and T.J. Schneyer, "Professional Self-Regulation and Shared-Risk Programs for In Vitro Fertilization," Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 25 (1997): at 285.
2. Id. at 290.
3. See id. at 284.
4. See id.
5. Id. at MS 286.
6. See id.
7. See id. at 287 (citing Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1997): at 94-95).
8. See id. at 287 (citing Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1997): at 94-95).
9. See Robertson and Schneyer, supra note 1, at 286.
10. M.J. Radin, "Market-Inalienability," Harvard Law Review, 100 (1987): at 1885-86.
11. See M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983). Michael Walzer suggests this distributive principle: "No social good x should be distributed to men and women who possess some other good y merely because they possess y and without regard to the meaning of x." Id. at 20 (original emphasis).
12. See M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983). Michael Walzer suggests this distributive principle: "No social good x should be distributed to men and women who possess some other good y merely because they possess y and without regard to the meaning of x." Id. at 20 (original emphasis).
13. See T.H. Murray, The Worth of a Child (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).