|
|
|
Volumn 665, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 665-708
|
|
The right to die and the jurisprudence of tradition.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DEPRESSION;
EUTHANASIA;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MEDICAL ERROR;
MENTAL STRESS;
MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHYSICIAN;
POLITICAL SYSTEM;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
UNITED STATES;
VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COERCION;
DEMOCRACY;
DEPRESSIVE DISORDER;
EUTHANASIA;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MEDICAL ERRORS;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONS;
PHYSICIANS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TERMINALLY ILL;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
|
|
EID: 0031290162
PISSN: 00421448
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (45)
|
|
References (0)
|
