Measuring perceptions of the work environment for female faculty

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 63-78

  Riger, Stephanie ^a   Stokes, Joseph ^a   Raja, Sheela ^a   Sullivan, Megan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031287605     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Angier, N. (1995, May 14). Why science loses women in the ranks. New York Times, p. 5.
2. Bentley, R. J., & Blackburn, R. T. (1992). Two decades of gains for female faculty. Teachers College Record, 93, 697-709.
3. Caplan, P. (1993). Lifting a ton of feathers: A woman's guide to surviving in the academic world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4. Chamberlain, M. (1988). Faculty women: Preparation, participation, and progress. In M. Chamberlain (Ed.), Women in academe: Progress and prospects (pp. 255-273). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Cole, J. R. (1981). Women in science. American Scientist, 69, 385-391.
6. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in motivation and achievement, 2, 217-258.
7. Dwyer, M. M., Flynn, A. A., &, Inman, P. S. (1991). Differential progress of women faculty: Status 1980-1990. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 173-222). New York: Agathon Press.
8. Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., Uzzi, B., & Alonzo, J. (1994, October 7). The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science, 266, 51-54.
9. Evangelauf, J. (1994, April 6). A new Carnegie classification. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A17.
10. Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession: A synthesis of social scientific inquiry since World War II. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
11. Fox, M. F., & Ferri, V. C. (1992). Women, men, and their attributions for success in academe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 257-271.
12. Harassment Task Force of the Ontario Council of Regents. (1992). Report on harassment and discrimination in Ontario colleges of applied arts technology. Unpublished manuscript.
13. Hensel, N. (1989). Resolving the conflict: Parenting and professorship. NEA Higher Education Journal, 5, 71-84.
14. Johnsrud, L. K., & Atwater, C. D. (1988). Barriers to retention and tenure at UH-Manoa: The experiences of faculty cohorts. Unpublished manuscript.
15. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965-990.
16. Konrad, A. M. (1991). Faculty productivity and demographics. NEA Higher Education Journal, 7, 19-54.
17. McKinney, K. (1990). Sexual harassment of university faculty by colleagues and students. Sex Roles, 23, 421-438.
18. Moore, K. M., & Sagaria, M. D. (1993). The situation of women in research universities in the United States: Within the inner circles of academic power. In J. S. Glazer, E. M. Bensimon, & B. Townsend (Eds.), Women in higher education: A feminist perspective (pp. 227-240). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
19. Sandler, B., & Hall, R. M. (1986). The campus climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
20. Smart, J. C. (1991). Gender equity in academic rank and salary. The Review of Higher Education, 14, 511-526.
21. Stokes, J., Riger, S., & Sullivan, M. (1995). Measuring perceptions of the working environment for women in corporate settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 533-549.
22. South, S., Bonjean, C., Markham, W., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interactions: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 47, 587-599.
23. Toren, N., & Klaus, V. (1987). The effects of minority size on women's position in academia. Social Forces, 65, 1090-1100.
24. Wyche, K. F., & Graves, S. B. (1992). Minority women in academia: Access and barriers to professional participation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 429-437.
25. Yoder, J. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender and Society, 5, 178-192.
26. Zuckerman, H., & Cole, J. (1975). Women in American science. Minerva, 18, 82-102.