You, we, and I: Relationships between verbal expressions of communality and dyadic conflict behavior

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 456-463

  Vogelzang, Leo N ^a   Euwema, Martin C ^a   Nauta, Aukje ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031286666     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X970164006     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Acitelli, L. K (1993). You, me, and us: Perspectives on relationship awareness. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Individuals in relationships (pp. 144-174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Barker, J., Tjosvold, D., & Andrews, I. R. (1988). Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective project managers: A field study in a matrix organization. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 167-178.
3. Bochner, A. P. (1991). On the paradigm that would not die. Communication Yearbook, 14, 484-491.
4. Burke, K. (1962). A grammar of motives and a rhetoric of motives. New York: World.
5. Carnevale, P.J.D., Pruitt, D. G., & Seilheimer, S. (1981). Looking and competing: Accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111-120.
6. Duck, S. W. (Ed.). (1994). Dynamics of relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Euwema, M. C. (1992). Conflicthantering in organisaties [Conflict management in organizations]. Amsterdam: VU Press.
8. Fitzpatrick, M. A., Mulac, A., & Dindia, K (1995). Gender-preferential language use in spouse and stranger interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 18-39.
9. Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Strutman, R. K. (1993). Working through conflict: Strategies for relationships, groups, and organizations, (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
10. Giles, H., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1985). Personal, group and couple identities: Towards a relational context for the study of language attitudes and linguistic forms. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use on context: Linguistic applications (pp. 1-25). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
11. Malz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 195-216). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Nauta, A., (1996). Oog om oog en baas boven baas [Battle and bossiness in business]. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Ponsen & Looijen.
13. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
14. Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiating processes in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 651-717). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
16. Tjosvold, D. (1991). The conflict-positive organization: Stimulate diversity and create unity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesly.
17. Tutzauer, F., & Roloff, M. E. (1988). Communicative processes leading to integrative agreements: Three paths to joint benefits. Communication Research, 15, 360-380.
18. Van de Vliert, E., & Euwema, M. C. (1994). Agreeableness and activeness as components of conflict behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 674-687.
19. Van de Vliert, E., Euwema, M. C., Huismans, S. E. (1995). Managing conflict with a subordinate or superior: The effectiveness of conglomerated behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 271-281.
20. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
21. Williams, G. R. (1993). Style and effectiveness in negotiating. In L. Hall (Ed.), Negotiation: Strategies for mutual gain (pp. 151-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.