Toward the phylogeny of caucasian rock lizards: Implications from mitochondrial DNA gene sequences (Reptilia: Lacertidae)

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 463-477

  Fu, Jinzhong ^a   Murphy, Robert W ^a   Darevsky, Ilya S ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Canada)

^b ZOOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Archaeolacerta; Caucasus mountains; Cytochrome b ATPase 6 hybridization; Lacerta; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLACERTA; DAREVSKIA DERJUGINI; DAREVSKIA RADDEI; LACERTA; LACERTA NAIRENSIS; LACERTIDAE; PETROSAURUS; REPTILIA; SAXICOLA; SQUAMATA;

EID: 0031286646     PISSN: 00244082     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1997.tb01283.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barrett M, Donoghue MJ, Sober E. 1991. Against consensus. Systematic Zoology 40: 486-493.
2. Birt TP, Vriesen VL, Green JM, Montevecchi WA, Davidson WS. 1992. Cytochrome-b sequence variation among parrots. Heredity 117: 67-72.
3. Bobyn ML, Darevsky IS, Kupriyanova LA, MacCulloch RD, Upton DE, Danielyan FD, Murphy RW. 1996. Genetic variation among population of the Caucasian rock lizards of the Lacerta raddei complex from Armenia. Amphibia-Reptilia 17: 233-246.
4. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
5. Cabot EL, Beckenbach AT. 1989. Simultaneous editing of multiple nucleic acid and protein sequences with ESEE. Computer Applications in Bioscience 5: 233-234.
6. Cracraft J, Helm-Bychowski K. 1991. Parsimony and phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: some methodological strategies. In: Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J, eds. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. New York: Oxford University Press, 184-220.
7. Darevskii IS. 1967. Rock lizards of the Caucasus: systematics, ecology and phylogenesis of the polymorphic groups of Caucasian rock lizards of the subgenus Archaeolacerta. Leningrad: Nauka, 1-216 [in Russian].
8. Darevsky IS. 1993. The rock lizards of the Caucasus: the present state of the problem. Program and Abstract, 7th Ordinary General Meeting of the Society of European Herpetology. 15-19 September, Barcelona. 59.
9. de Queiroz A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Systematic Biology 42: 368-372.
10. Doyle JJ. 1992. Gene tree and species tree: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Botany 17: 144-163.
11. Faith DP, Cranston PS. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? On permutation tests for cladistic structure Cladistics 7: 1-28.
12. Farris JS. 1969. A successive weighting approximation approach to character analysis. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-385.
13. Farris JS. 1988. Hennig86, version 1.5. Distributed by the author, Port Jefferson Station, N.Y.
14. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
15. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
16. Fu J, Murphy RW. 1997. Phylogeny of Chinese Oreolalax and the use of functional outgroups to select among multiple equally parsimonious trees. Asiatic Herpetological Research 7: 38-43.
17. Hillis DM. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic. 18: 23-42.
18. Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
19. Hillis DM, Huelsenbeck JP. 1992. Signal, noise and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
20. Hillis DM, Huelsenbeck JP, Cunningham CW. 1994. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science 264: 671-677.
21. Huelsenbeck JP. 1991. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology 40: 257-270.
22. Jones, TR, Kluge AG, and Wolf AJ. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: a phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Zoology 42: 92-102.
23. Kluge AG. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
24. Kluge AG, Wolf AJ. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9: 183-199.
25. Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablance FX, Wilson AC. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences 86: 6196-6200.
26. Lantz L, and Cyrén O. 1936. Contribution à la connaissance de Lacerta saxicola Eversmann. Bulletin Société Zoologique de France 61: 159-181.
27. Lanyon SM. 1993. Phylogenetic frameworks: Towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 49: 45-61.
28. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.04. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 1-398.
29. Méhely L von. 1909. Materialien zu einer Systematik und Phylogenie der Muralis-änlichen Lacerten. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 7: 409-621.
30. Mickevich MF. 1978. Taxonomic congruence. Systematic Zoology 27: 143-158.
31. Miyamoto MM. 1985. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1: 186-189.
32. Moritz C, Uzzell T, Spolsky S, Hotz H, Darevsky I, Kupriyanova L, Danielyan F. 1992. The material [maternal] ancestry and approximate age of parthenogenetic species of Caucasian rock lizards (Lacerta:. Lacertidae). Genetica 87: 53-62.
33. Murphy RW, Kovac V, Haddrath O, Allen GS, Fishbein A, Mandrak N. 1995. mtDNA gene sequence, allozyme, and morphological uniformity among red diamond rattlesnake, Crotalus ruber and Crotalus exsul. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73: 270-281.
34. Murphy RW, Darevsky IS, MacCulloch RD, Fu J, Kupriyanova L. 1996. Evolution of the bisexual species of Caucasian rock lizards: a phylogenetic evaluation of allozyme data. Russian Journal of Herpetology 3: 18-31.
35. Omland KE. 1994. Character congruence between a molecular and a morphological phylogeny for dabbling ducks (Anas). Systematic Biology 43: 369-386.
36. Roe BA, Ma D-P, Wilson RK, Wong JF-H. 1985. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Xenopus laevis mitochondrial genome. Journal of Biology and Chemistry 260: 9759-9774.
37. Siddall ME. 1995. Random Cladistics, version 3.0; University of Toronto, Department of Zoology.
38. Smith AB. 1989. RNA sequence data in phylogenetic reconstruction: testing the limits of its resolution. Cladistics 5: 321-344.
39. Swofford DL. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruence? In: Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J, eds. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. New York: Oxford University Press, 295-333.
40. Swofford DL. 1993. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
41. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular systematics. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
42. Trueman JWH. 1993. Randomization confounded: A response to Carpenter. Cladistics 9: 101-109.
43. Upton DE, and Murphy RW. 1997. Phylogeny of the side-blotched lizards (Phrynosomatidae: Uta) based on mtDNA sequences: Support for a mid-peninsular seaway in Baja California. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (in press).
44. Uzzell T, and Darevsky IS. 1973. Electrophoretic examination of Lacerta mixta, a possible hybrid species. Journal of Herpetology 7: 11-15.
45. Watrous LE, Wheeler QD. 1981. The outgroup comparison method of character analysis. Systematic Zoology 30: 1-11.
46. Williams PL, Fitch WM. 1989. Finding the minimal change in a given tree. In. Fernholm B, Bremer K, Jornvall H, eds. The hierarchy of life, molecular and morphology in phylogenetc analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.