Effects of increasing oral reading: Generalization across reading tasks

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 233-250

  Markell, Marc A ^a   Deno, Stanley L ^b  

^a ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031286563     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002246699703100205     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, R. C., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Mason, J. M. (1991). A micro analysis of the small group, guided reading lesson: Effects of an emphasis on global story meaning. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 417-441.
2. Carney, J. J., & Cioffi, G. (1990). Extending traditional diagnosis: The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 11, 177-192.
3. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
4. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
5. Ekwall, E. E. (1976). Diagnosis and remediation of the disabled reader. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Farr, R. C., & Carey, R. F. (1986). Reading: What can be measured? (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
7. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally-relevant measures models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488-500.
8. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S. (1982). Reliability and validity of curriculum-based informal reading inventories. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 16-26.
9. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20-28.
10. Gay, L. R. (1984). Educational research, competencies for analysis and application (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
11. Jenkins, J., & Jewell, M. (1992). Validity of the Basic Academic Skill Samples (BASS). Diagnostique, 17, 273-288.
12. Johns, J. (1992). How professionals view portfolio assessment. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(1), 1-10.
13. Johnson, D. D., & Pearson, P. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
14. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, J. S. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
15. Linn, R., Baker, E., & Dunbar, S. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.
16. Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. (1985). Implementing curriculum-based measurement in special and regular education settings. Exceptional Children, 52, 266-275.
17. Mirkin, P., Deno, S., Fuchs, L., Wesson, C., Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Kuehnle, K. (1981). Procedures to develop and monitor progress on IEP goals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
18. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., III, Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement reading fluency: A confirmatory analyses of its relationship to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
19. Weiss, B. J., Evertts, E. L., Cruikshank, S. B., Steurer, L. O., & Hunt, L. C. (1983). Holt basic reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 200-214.
21. Yell, M., Deno, S., & Marston, D. (1989). Barriers to implementing curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique, 18(1), 99.