Reliability and validity of the situational confidence questionnaire in an adolescent sample: Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 146-155

  Kirisci, Levent ^a   Moss, Howard B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031286309     PISSN: 07481756     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07481756.1997.12068935     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. Annis, H. M. (1984). Situational Confidence Questionnaire, short form. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
4. Annis, H. M. (1987). Situational Confidence Questionnaire, short form. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
5. Annis, H. M., & Davis, C. S. (1988). Assessment of expectancies in alcohol dependent clients. In D. Donovan & A. Marlatt (Eds.), Assessment of addictive behavior (pp. 84-111). New York: Guilford.
6. Annis, H. M., & Graham, J. M. (1988). Situational Confidence Questionnaire (SCQ-39): User's guide. Toronto, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation.
7. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
8. Botvin, G. J., & Botvin, E. M. (1992). Adolescent tobacco, alcohol, and drug abuse: Prevention strategies, empirical findings, and assessment issues. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 290-301.
9. Chamblis, C., & Murray, E. J. (1979). Efficacy attribution, locus-of-control, and weight loss. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3, 349-354.
10. Chaney, E. F., O'Leary, M. R., & Marlatt, G. A. (1978). Skill training with alcoholics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1092-1104.
11. Condiotte, M. M., & Lichtenstein, E. (1981). Self-efficacy and relapse In smoking cessation programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 648-658.
12. De Ayala, R. J. (1993). An introduction to polytomous item response theory models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 172-189.
13. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principal and applications. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
14. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
15. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.
16. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7. Mooreville, IN: Scientific Software.
17. Leckman, J., Sholumskas, D., Thompson, W. D., Belanger, A., & Weissman. M. M. (1982). Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis: A methodological study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 879-883.
18. Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Cognitive factors in the relapse process. In G. A. Marlatt, & J. R. Gordon (Eds.), Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors (pp. 128-200). New York: Guilford.
19. McKay, J. R. Maisto, S. A., & O'Farrell, T. J. (1993). End-of treatment self-efficacy in alcoholics: Clinical validation of the Situational Confidence Questionnaire. Addictive Behaviors, 14, 217-224.
20. Miller, P. J., Ross, S. M., Emmerson, R. Y., & Todt, E. H. (1989). Self-efficacy in alcoholics: Clinical validation of the Situational Confidence Questionnaire. Addictive Behaviors, 14, 217-224.
21. Moss, H. B., Kirisci, L., & Mezzich, A. (1994). Psychiatric comorbidlty and the self-efficacy to resist heavy drinking in alcoholic and non-alcoholic adolescents. American Journal on Addictions, 3, 204-212.
22. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monographs, 34(4, Pt. 2, Suppl. 17).
23. Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory (Version 6). Chicago: Scientific Software.