A cross-national comparison of Australian and Canadian supervisors' attributional and evaluative responses to subordinate performance

Australian Psychologist

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 29-36

  Ashkanasy, Neal M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031285960     PISSN: 00050067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00050069708259615     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ashkanasy, N.M. (1989). Causal attribution and supervisors' response to subordinate performance: The Green and Mitchell model revisited. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 309-330.
2. Ashkanasy, N.M. (1991). The effect of perceived locus of control and situational control on supervisors' responses to subordinate performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 525-544.
3. Ashkanasy, N.M. (1994). Automatic categorisation and causal attribution: The effect of gender bias in supervisor responses to subordinate performance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 177-182.
4. Ashkanasy, N.M. (1995). Supervisory attributions and evaluative judgments of subordinate performance: A further test of the Green and Mitchell model. In M.J. Martinko (Ed.), Advances in attribution theory: An organisational perspective (pp. 211-228). Delray Beach, FL: St Lucie Press.
5. Ashkanasy, N.M., & Gallois, C. (1987). Locus of control and attributions for academic performance of self and others. Australian Journal of Psychology, 39, 293-305.
6. Ashkanasy, N.M., & Gallois, C. (1994). Leader attributions and evaluations: Effects of locus of control, supervisory control, and task control. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 59, 27-50.
7. Dragutinovich, S., & White, K.D. (1983). Australian norms and factorial confirmation of Reid and Ware's multidimensional internal-external scale. Australian Psychologist, 18, 161-178.
8. Duda, J.L., & Allison, M.T. (1989). The attributional theory of achievement motivation: Cross-cultural considerations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13, 37-55.
9. Erez, M. (1994). Towards a model of cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H.C. Triandis, M.D. Dunnette, & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 559-607). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10. Feather, N.T. (1975). Values and education in society. New York: Free Press.
11. Feather, N.T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 1-73.
12. Forgas, J.P., Furnham, A., & Frey, D. (1989). Cross-national differences in attributions of wealth and economic success. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 643-657.
13. Green, S.G., & Mitchell, T.R. (1979). Attributional processes in leader-member interactions. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 23, 429-458.
14. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Kashima, Y., & Triandis, H.C. (1986). The self-serving bias in attributions and coping strategy: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 17, 83-97.
16. Kelley, H.H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behaviour (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
17. Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
18. Marsh, H.W., & Bryne, B.M. (1993). Do we see ourselves as others infer? A comparison of self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of the self-concept from two continents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 49-58.
19. Martinko, M.J. (1995). The nature and function of attribution theory within the organisational sciences. In M.J. Martinko (Ed.), Advances in attribution theory: An organisational perspective (pp. 7-14). Delray Beach, FL: St Lucie Press.
20. Mitchell, T.R., Green, S.G., & Wood, R.E. (1981). An attributional model of leadership and the poor performing subordinate: Development and validation. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 3, 197-234.
21. Pepitone, A. (1986). Culture and the cognitive paradigm in social psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 245-256.
22. Reid, D.W., & Ware, E.E. (1973). Multidimensionality of internal versus external control: Implications for past and future research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 6, 131-142.
23. Reynolds, K.D., & West, S.G. (1989). Attributional constructs: Their role in the organization of social information in memory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 119-130.
24. Schuster, B., Försterlung, F., & Weiner, B. (1989). Perceiving the causes of success and failure: A cross-cultural examination of attributional concepts. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 20, 191-213.
25. Singelis, T.M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk, D.P.S., & Gelfand, M.J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
26. Tourangeau, R., Rasinski, K.A., Bradburn, N., & D'Andrade, R. (1989). Carryover effects in attitude surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 495-524.
27. Triandis, H.C. (1994). Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H.C. Triandis, M.D. Dunnette, & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 103-172). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
28. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
29. Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R.S. (1972). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behaviour (pp. 95-121). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
30. Williams, L.J., & Brown, B.K. (1994). Method variance in organisational behaviour and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209.